On Thursday, September 4, 2025 7:38 PM Amit Kapila
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 10:51 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
> wrote:
> >
> > On Friday, August 29, 2025 12:05 PM Amit Kapila
> wrote:
> > >
> > > bool
> > > -AllTablesyncsReady(void)
> > > +AllTablesyncsReady(bool ready_if_no_tables)
> >
On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 10:51 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
wrote:
>
> On Friday, August 29, 2025 12:05 PM Amit Kapila
> wrote:
> >
> > bool
> > -AllTablesyncsReady(void)
> > +AllTablesyncsReady(bool ready_if_no_tables)
> >
> > This change serves the purpose but I find it makes the API complex to
> >
On Friday, August 29, 2025 12:05 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 7:54 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > My colleague Nisha reported an issue to me off-list: dead tuples can't
> > be removed when retain_dead_tuples is enabled for a subscription with no
> table
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 7:54 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My colleague Nisha reported an issue to me off-list: dead tuples can't
> be removed when retain_dead_tuples is enabled for a subscription with no
> tables.
>
> This appears to stem from the inability to advance the non-remova
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 7:54 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My colleague Nisha reported an issue to me off-list: dead tuples can't
> be removed when retain_dead_tuples is enabled for a subscription with no
> tables.
>
> This appears to stem from the inability to advance the non-remova
Just a typo:
+* it seem feasible to skip all phases and directly assign
Should be "it seems".
Regards,
Steven
在 2025/8/28 10:23, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 写道:
Hi,
My colleague Nisha reported an issue to me off-list: dead tuples can't
be removed when retain_dead_tuples is enabled for a s
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 7:54 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My colleague Nisha reported an issue to me off-list: dead tuples can't
> be removed when retain_dead_tuples is enabled for a subscription with no
> tables.
>
> This appears to stem from the inability to advance the non-remova
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 7:54 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My colleague Nisha reported an issue to me off-list: dead tuples can't
> be removed when retain_dead_tuples is enabled for a subscription with no
> tables.
>
> This appears to stem from the inability to advance the non-remova
Hi,
My colleague Nisha reported an issue to me off-list: dead tuples can't
be removed when retain_dead_tuples is enabled for a subscription with no tables.
This appears to stem from the inability to advance the non-removable transaction
ID when AllTablesyncsReady() returns false. Since this funct
