On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 16:13, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I wonder if we wouldn't be better advised to require exactly one dot.
> This isn't a feature that we really encourage users to use, and the
> further we move the goalposts for it, the harder it will be to replace
> it. In particular I doubt the l
Alexander Kukushkin writes:
> At the moment the only requirement for custom parameter names is that they
> should have one or more dots.
> ...
> But, Postgres fails to start if such parameters are set in the
> configuration file with the following error:
Hmm.
> In my opinion it would be fair to
dc5f86f83c39c98c269a98c85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Kukushkin
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 13:21:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Allow custom parameters with more than one dot in config
files.
To make it consistent with the rest of the code responsible for GUC
handling.
---
src/backen
