On Thu, 24 Aug 2023, at 11:05, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 4 Aug 2023, at 01:36, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 09:38:12PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> Great, thanks! I had a quick look at this while rebasing (as well as your
>>> updated patch) and it seems like a
> On 4 Aug 2023, at 01:36, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 09:38:12PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> Great, thanks! I had a quick look at this while rebasing (as well as your
>> updated patch) and it seems like a good idea to add this. Unless there are
>> objections I will
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 09:38:12PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Great, thanks! I had a quick look at this while rebasing (as well as your
> updated patch) and it seems like a good idea to add this. Unless there are
> objections I will look at getting this in.
Hey Daniel, are you still plann
> On 19 Jul 2023, at 19:32, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>
>> This patch no longer applied but had a fairly trivial conflict so I've
>> attached
>> a rebased v3 addressing the conflict in the hopes of getting this further.
>
> Thanks for the heads-up! Turns o
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
> This patch no longer applied but had a fairly trivial conflict so I've
> attached
> a rebased v3 addressing the conflict in the hopes of getting this further.
Thanks for the heads-up! Turns out the conflict was due to the new
json(b)_object_agg(_unique)(_strict) fun
This patch no longer applied but had a fairly trivial conflict so I've attached
a rebased v3 addressing the conflict in the hopes of getting this further.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
v3-0001-Add-argument-names-to-multi-argument-aggregates.patch
Description: Binary data
On 18.04.23 12:27, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
Link to the actual job:
https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5881376021413888
The failure was:
[09:54:38.727] 216/262 postgresql:recovery / recovery/031_recovery_conflict
ERROR 198.73s exit status 60
Looking at its log:
https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/ar
Jim Jones writes:
> On 18.04.23 10:58, I wrote:
>> On 14.04.23 12:03, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>>> Thanks for the heads-up, here's a rebased patch. I've also formatted
>>> the lines to match what reformat_dat_file.pl wants. It also wanted to
>>> reformat a bunch of other entries, but I le
On 18.04.23 10:58, I wrote:
On 14.04.23 12:03, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
Thanks for the heads-up, here's a rebased patch. I've also formatted
the lines to match what reformat_dat_file.pl wants. It also wanted to
reformat a bunch of other entries, but I left those alone.
- ilmari
The pa
On 14.04.23 12:03, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
Thanks for the heads-up, here's a rebased patch. I've also formatted
the lines to match what reformat_dat_file.pl wants. It also wanted to
reformat a bunch of other entries, but I left those alone.
- ilmari
The patch applies cleanly now and \
Jim Jones writes:
> On 12.04.23 19:53, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>> Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker writes:
>>
>>> Hi hackers,
>>>
>>> I'm sure I'm not the only one who can never remember which way around
>>> the value and delimiter arguments go for string_agg() and has to look it
>>> up in the m
On 12.04.23 19:53, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker writes:
Hi hackers,
I'm sure I'm not the only one who can never remember which way around
the value and delimiter arguments go for string_agg() and has to look it
up in the manual every time. To make it more convenie
Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker writes:
> Hi hackers,
>
> I'm sure I'm not the only one who can never remember which way around
> the value and delimiter arguments go for string_agg() and has to look it
> up in the manual every time. To make it more convenient, here's a patch
> that adds proargnames to
On 2/27/23 14:22, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
Hi hackers,
I'm sure I'm not the only one who can never remember which way around
the value and delimiter arguments go for string_agg() and has to look it
up in the manual every time. To make it more convenient, here's a patch
that adds proargnam
Hi hackers,
I'm sure I'm not the only one who can never remember which way around
the value and delimiter arguments go for string_agg() and has to look it
up in the manual every time. To make it more convenient, here's a patch
that adds proargnames to its pg_proc entries so that it can be seen wit
15 matches
Mail list logo