On 2020-10-05 10:20:01 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 10:08 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> > In these days when we run almost all test cases in parallel, it's
> > frequently not that easy to tie a "TRAP: ..." message in the log
> > to nearby log messages. (The postmaster's subsequent c
Michael Paquier writes:
> +1. (log_line_prefix includes %p in its default configuration for the
> TAP tests).
Right, but of course you don't get log_line_prefix on Assert messages.
regards, tom lane
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 10:20:01AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 10:08 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>> In these days when we run almost all test cases in parallel, it's
>> frequently not that easy to tie a "TRAP: ..." message in the log
>> to nearby log messages. (The postmaster's sub
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 10:08 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> In these days when we run almost all test cases in parallel, it's
> frequently not that easy to tie a "TRAP: ..." message in the log
> to nearby log messages. (The postmaster's subsequent complaint
> often helps, but it could be some distance away
In these days when we run almost all test cases in parallel, it's
frequently not that easy to tie a "TRAP: ..." message in the log
to nearby log messages. (The postmaster's subsequent complaint
often helps, but it could be some distance away in the log; and
good luck untangling things if more than
