At Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:34:01 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote
in
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:10 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> wrote:
> >
> > At Wed, 13 Jan 2021 16:51:32 -0300, Alvaro Herrera
> > wrote in
> > > On 2021-Jan-13, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for the review!
> > > > I'm ok with this
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:10 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote:
>
> At Wed, 13 Jan 2021 16:51:32 -0300, Alvaro Herrera
> wrote in
> > On 2021-Jan-13, Fujii Masao wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for the review!
> > > I'm ok with this change (i.e., insert only single row).
> > > Attached is the updated version
At Wed, 13 Jan 2021 16:51:32 -0300, Alvaro Herrera
wrote in
> On 2021-Jan-13, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the review!
> > I'm ok with this change (i.e., insert only single row).
> > Attached is the updated version of the patch.
>
> Looks good to me, thanks!
+1
regards.
--
Kyotaro H
On 2021-Jan-13, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Thanks for the review!
> I'm ok with this change (i.e., insert only single row).
> Attached is the updated version of the patch.
Looks good to me, thanks!
--
Álvaro Herrera39°49'30"S 73°17'W
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 10:48 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote:
>
> At Tue, 12 Jan 2021 10:47:21 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote
> in
> > On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 5:08 AM Alvaro Herrera
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Masao-san: Are you intending to act as committer for these? Since the
> > > bug is mine I can look
At Tue, 12 Jan 2021 10:47:21 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote
in
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 5:08 AM Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >
> > Masao-san: Are you intending to act as committer for these? Since the
> > bug is mine I can look into it, but since you already did all the
> > reviewing work, I'm good with
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 5:08 AM Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> Masao-san: Are you intending to act as committer for these? Since the
> bug is mine I can look into it, but since you already did all the
> reviewing work, I'm good with you giving it the final push.
Thanks! I'm thinking to push the patch.
Masao-san: Are you intending to act as committer for these? Since the
bug is mine I can look into it, but since you already did all the
reviewing work, I'm good with you giving it the final push.
0001 looks good to me; let's get that one committed quickly so that we
can focus on the interesting s
At Thu, 7 Jan 2021 11:55:33 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
>
>
> On 2021/01/05 17:26, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > At Mon, 4 Jan 2021 19:00:21 +0900, Fujii Masao
> > wrote in
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2021/01/04 12:06, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> >>> At Sat, 26 Dec 2020 02:15:06 +0900, Fujii Masao
> >>>
On 2021/01/05 17:26, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
At Mon, 4 Jan 2021 19:00:21 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
On 2021/01/04 12:06, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
At Sat, 26 Dec 2020 02:15:06 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
On 2020/12/25 12:03, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
The attached is the fixed version
At Tue, 05 Jan 2021 17:26:02 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote in
> Thanks. The attached is the revised patchset.
It is not applicable to PG13 due to wording changes. This is an
applicable all-in-one version to PG13.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
>From d4b
At Mon, 4 Jan 2021 19:00:21 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
>
>
> On 2021/01/04 12:06, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > At Sat, 26 Dec 2020 02:15:06 +0900, Fujii Masao
> > wrote in
> >>
> >> On 2020/12/25 12:03, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > The attached is the fixed version.
>
> Thanks for updating
On 2021/01/04 12:06, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
At Sat, 26 Dec 2020 02:15:06 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
On 2020/12/25 12:03, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
Thank you for looking this.
At Thu, 24 Dec 2020 15:33:04 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
When I applied two patches in the master branch and
At Sat, 26 Dec 2020 02:15:06 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
>
>
> On 2020/12/25 12:03, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > Thank you for looking this.
> > At Thu, 24 Dec 2020 15:33:04 +0900, Fujii Masao
> > wrote in
> >> When I applied two patches in the master branch and
> >> ran "make check-world", I
On 2020/12/25 12:03, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
Thank you for looking this.
At Thu, 24 Dec 2020 15:33:04 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
When I applied two patches in the master branch and
ran "make check-world", I got the following error.
== creating database "contrib_regression" =
Thank you for looking this.
At Thu, 24 Dec 2020 15:33:04 +0900, Fujii Masao
wrote in
> When I applied two patches in the master branch and
> ran "make check-world", I got the following error.
>
> == creating database "contrib_regression" ==
> # Looks like you planned 37
On 2020/12/09 17:43, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
Hello.
We found a behavioral change (which seems to be a bug) in recovery at
PG13.
The following steps might seem somewhat strange but the replication
code deliberately cope with the case. This is a sequense seen while
operating a HA cluseter us
Hello.
We found a behavioral change (which seems to be a bug) in recovery at
PG13.
The following steps might seem somewhat strange but the replication
code deliberately cope with the case. This is a sequense seen while
operating a HA cluseter using Pacemaker.
- Run initdb to create a primary.
-
18 matches
Mail list logo
