Re: vs formatting in the docs

2020-10-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 04:57:34PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 2020-09-25 07:38, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > So, based on that, I think the patch proposed here is not the right one, > > and we should instead be marking up the link sources appropriately. > > I have committed a fix for this:

Re: vs formatting in the docs

2020-10-03 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 2020-09-25 07:38, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > So, based on that, I think the patch proposed here is not the right one, > and we should instead be marking up the link sources appropriately. I have committed a fix for this: Improve vs. formatting in the documentation SQL commands are ge

Re: vs formatting in the docs

2020-09-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 2020-07-10 17:05, Peter Eisentraut wrote: On 2020-06-21 18:57, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: Attached are two patches: the first adds the missing tags, the second adds to all the SQL commands (specifically anything with 7). I have committed the first one. I have some concerns about the

Re: vs formatting in the docs

2020-07-10 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 2020-06-21 18:57, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: Attached are two patches: the first adds the missing tags, the second adds to all the SQL commands (specifically anything with 7). I have committed the first one. I have some concerns about the second one. If you look at the diff of the

Re: vs formatting in the docs

2020-06-21 Thread Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Alvaro Herrera writes: > On 2020-Jun-21, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: > >> While looking at making more SQL into links, I >> noticed that loses the monospace formatting of , and >> can't itself be wrapped in . > > Ouch. > >> By some trial and error I found that putting inside the >> tag pro

Re: vs formatting in the docs

2020-06-21 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On 2020-Jun-21, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: > While looking at making more SQL into links, I > noticed that loses the monospace formatting of , and > can't itself be wrapped in . Ouch. > By some trial and error I found that putting inside the > tag propagates the formatting to the conten

vs formatting in the docs

2020-06-21 Thread Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Hi Hackers, While looking at making more SQL into links, I noticed that loses the monospace formatting of , and can't itself be wrapped in . This becomes particularly apparent when you have one link that can be an next to another that's ... because it's actually referring to a specific variant