On 7/9/25 16:30, Frédéric Yhuel wrote:
On 7/9/25 16:06, Mihail Nikalayeu wrote:
Hello!
No, I think the comment is correct, it is about [0].
[0]: https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/
f5a987c0e5f6bbf0cc0420228dc57e7aae4d7e8f/src/backend/commands/
indexcmds.c#L4217
Aaahhh... yes, y
On 7/9/25 16:06, Mihail Nikalayeu wrote:
Hello!
No, I think the comment is correct, it is about [0].
[0]:
https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/f5a987c0e5f6bbf0cc0420228dc57e7aae4d7e8f/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c#L4217
Aaahhh... yes, you're right! thanks!
Hello!
No, I think the comment is correct, it is about [0].
[0]:
https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/f5a987c0e5f6bbf0cc0420228dc57e7aae4d7e8f/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c#L4217
Hi,
I believe that the description of which transactions will block a CREATE
INDEX CONCURRENTLY command from proceeding isn't right.
Please find the attached patch.
Best regards,
FrédéricFrom cf3ecfda5155584e7c1d81c5daaf04e78d4fddef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric=