On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 2:02 PM John Naylor wrote:
> My 2 cents: Comment typos are visible to readers, so more annoying
> when seen in isolation, and less likely to have surroundings that
> could change in back branches. Consistency would preferred all else
> being equal, but then again nothing is
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 4:40 PM Peter Smith wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 6:30 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 01:11:15PM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> > > I noticed one or two "monitoring" links and linkends that are slightly
> > > inconsistent from all the others.
> >
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 6:30 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 01:11:15PM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> > I noticed one or two "monitoring" links and linkends that are slightly
> > inconsistent from all the others.
>
> -
> +
>
> Is that really worth bothering for the interna
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 01:11:15PM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> I noticed one or two "monitoring" links and linkends that are slightly
> inconsistent from all the others.
-
+
Is that really worth bothering for the internal link references? This
can create extra backpatching conflicts.
--
Mi
I noticed one or two "monitoring" links and linkends that are slightly
inconsistent from all the others.
~~~
>From "Dynamic Statistics Views"
pg_stat_activity, linkend="monitoring-pg-stat-activity-view" ==> ok
pg_stat_replication, linkend="monitoring-pg-stat-replication-view" ==> ok
pg_stat_wal_
