Stephen Frost writes:
> Greetings Robbie,
>
> * Dmitry Dolgov (9erthali...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 11:12 PM Robbie Harwood wrote:
>> >
>> > Michael Paquier writes:
>> >
>> > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 05:23:28PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>> > >> If you're in a position w
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 10:20 AM Stephen Frost wrote:
> (and I have to wonder- if we want nearly all callers of
> WaitLatch/WaitLatchOrSocket to use WL_EXIT_ON_PM_DEATH, maybe we should
> make that the default and allow it to be overridden..? ...
That is what I proposed. It was Heikki who talked
Greetings Robbie,
* Dmitry Dolgov (9erthali...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 11:12 PM Robbie Harwood wrote:
> >
> > Michael Paquier writes:
> >
> > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 05:23:28PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > >> If you're in a position where you're using Kerberos (or most
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 11:12 PM Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
> Michael Paquier writes:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 05:23:28PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> >> If you're in a position where you're using Kerberos (or most other
> >> things from the GSSAPI) for authentication, the encryption comes a
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 05:23:28PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>> If you're in a position where you're using Kerberos (or most other
>> things from the GSSAPI) for authentication, the encryption comes at
>> little to no additional setup cost. And then you get all the s
