owner is really being released.
-Chap
>From 6541f1b5c28ede3bf0e88bb34d6a4eedc5731cab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chapman Flack
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 21:08:02 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Update README for Resource Owners.
Built-in support for three more categories of owned object has accreted
without mention in the READ
hap
>From 56c047c5fa963c0c22affdde2ce669ed88693e5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chapman Flack
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 20:16:42 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Update README for Resource Owners.
Built-in support for three more categories of owned object has accreted
without mention in the README.
---
Hi,
On 2018-04-06 19:46:25 -0400, Chapman Flack wrote:
> Hasn't been updated as built-in support grew for temp files, DSM segments,
> and JIT contexts.
>
> With enough luck, a README update won't break anything.
Wouldn't it be a better idea not to have a list there, that's guaranteed
to get out
-0400
Subject: [PATCH] Update README for Resource Owners.
Built-in support for three more categories of owned object has accreted
without mention in the README.
---
src/backend/utils/resowner/README | 13 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/re
