Re: [PATCH] Replace "implementor" with "implementer"

Hi Tom, > They're both valid according to the dictionaries I looked > at, eg [1]. I don't feel a need to change anything. OK, thanks. And sorry for the noise. -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev

Re: [PATCH] Replace "implementor" with "implementer"

Aleksander Alekseev writes: > I noticed that there are several places where we use the spelling > "implementOr" while the correct one seems to be "implementEr". Here is > the patch. They're both valid according to the dictionaries I looked at, eg [1]. I don't feel a need to change anything.

Re: [PATCH] Replace "implementor" with "implementer"

Hi hackers, > I noticed that there are several places where we use the spelling > "implementOr" while the correct one seems to be "implementEr". Here is > the patch. After a little more study I found evidence that both spellings can be acceptable [1]. As a non-native speaker I can't judge whether

[PATCH] Replace "implementor" with "implementer"

Hi hackers, I noticed that there are several places where we use the spelling "implementOr" while the correct one seems to be "implementEr". Here is the patch. -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev v1-0001-Fix-incorrect-spelling-of-the-word-implementer.patch Description: Binary data