On 2021-06-11T19:00:41+0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> We already have these same queries in the 'arrays' test against the
> 'array_op_test' table, though. It sure looks like a copy-paste error to me
> as well.
That's reason enough, but another reason is that I don't think GIN_CAT_NULL_KEY
is co
On 11/06/2021 18:31, Tom Lane wrote:
Jason Kim writes:
In the middle of GIN index testing, there are some selects that are on
a different table array_op_test that doesn't even have an index. They
probably were supposed to be selects to table array_index_op_test like
the other ones around the a
Jason Kim writes:
> In the middle of GIN index testing, there are some selects that are on
> a different table array_op_test that doesn't even have an index. They
> probably were supposed to be selects to table array_index_op_test like
> the other ones around the area.
I think it's probably inte
In the middle of GIN index testing, there are some selects that are on
a different table array_op_test that doesn't even have an index. They
probably were supposed to be selects to table array_index_op_test like
the other ones around the area.
Fix that. The expected output should stay the same b
