Re: [HACKERS] pg audit requirements

2017-11-15 Thread Pavel Stehule
2017-11-15 16:21 GMT+01:00 David Steele : > On 11/13/17 1:43 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > >> 2017-11-13 19:19 GMT+01:00 David Steele > > > > >> Thanks for the input! I'm not sure this is the best forum for >> comments, however, since pgAudit is not part of Postgres. >> >> Issues can be

Re: [HACKERS] pg audit requirements

2017-11-15 Thread David Steele
On 11/13/17 1:43 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: 2017-11-13 19:19 GMT+01:00 David Steele > Thanks for the input!  I'm not sure this is the best forum for comments, however, since pgAudit is not part of Postgres. Issues can be opened at the github site: https://github.com/pgaudit/pgaudi

Re: [HACKERS] pg audit requirements

2017-11-13 Thread Pavel Stehule
2017-11-13 19:19 GMT+01:00 David Steele : > Hi Pavel, > > On 11/10/17 2:33 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > >> >> I am sending some notes, experience about usage of pgAudit. >> > > Thanks for the input! I'm not sure this is the best forum for comments, > however, since pgAudit is not part of Postgres.

Re: [HACKERS] pg audit requirements

2017-11-13 Thread David Steele
Hi Pavel, On 11/10/17 2:33 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: I am sending some notes, experience about usage of pgAudit. Thanks for the input! I'm not sure this is the best forum for comments, however, since pgAudit is not part of Postgres. Issues can be opened at the github site: https://github.c