Re: [HACKERS] FOSDEM PGDay_2018_Developer_Meeting notes

2018-02-09 Thread Tomas Vondra
On 02/09/2018 02:27 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 07:55:32AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: >> * Michael Paquier (mich...@paquier.xyz) wrote: >>> Translate that with "Friday 13th as a lucky or unlucky date for Postgres >>> 13". And also translate it to a joke. >> >> Indeed.

Re: [HACKERS] FOSDEM PGDay_2018_Developer_Meeting notes

2018-02-09 Thread Michael Paquier
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 07:55:32AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Michael Paquier (mich...@paquier.xyz) wrote: > > Translate that with "Friday 13th as a lucky or unlucky date for Postgres > > 13". And also translate it to a joke. > > Indeed. Besides, the real date will be 2020-11-13. ;) This m

Re: [HACKERS] FOSDEM PGDay_2018_Developer_Meeting notes

2018-02-09 Thread Stephen Frost
* Michael Paquier (mich...@paquier.xyz) wrote: > On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 08:55:26AM +, Pantelis Theodosiou wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: > >> SIDE TOPIC: > >> > >> Release date for PostgreSQL 13 agreed: Friday 13th September 2019!! > > > > Isn't Postgres 12

Re: [HACKERS] FOSDEM PGDay_2018_Developer_Meeting notes

2018-02-09 Thread Michael Paquier
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 08:55:26AM +, Pantelis Theodosiou wrote: > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: >> SIDE TOPIC: >> >> Release date for PostgreSQL 13 agreed: Friday 13th September 2019!! > > Isn't Postgres 12 to be released in 2019? And 13 in 2020? Translate that with

Re: [HACKERS] FOSDEM PGDay_2018_Developer_Meeting notes

2018-02-09 Thread Dave Page
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Pantelis Theodosiou wrote: > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: > >> >> That was also what seemed to be the consensus coming out of the FOSDEM >> Developer meeting (notes here: >> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/FOSDEM/PGDay_2018_Developer_Meet

Re: [HACKERS] FOSDEM PGDay_2018_Developer_Meeting notes

2018-02-09 Thread Pantelis Theodosiou
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: > > That was also what seemed to be the consensus coming out of the FOSDEM > Developer meeting (notes here: > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/FOSDEM/PGDay_2018_Developer_Meeting). > > In the notes there is this, which confused me: > SIDE TO