Re: [HACKERS] Commits don't block for synchronous replication

2017-12-30 Thread Masahiko Sawada
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 02:45:09PM +, Simon Riggs wrote: >> Applied, thanks. Thank you! Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center

Re: [HACKERS] Commits don't block for synchronous replication

2017-12-30 Thread Michael Paquier
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 02:45:09PM +, Simon Riggs wrote: > Applied, thanks. Thanks, Simon. -- Michael signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [HACKERS] Commits don't block for synchronous replication

2017-12-29 Thread Simon Riggs
On 1 December 2017 at 02:50, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Simon Riggs wrote: >> On 23 November 2017 at 11:11, Michael Paquier >> wrote: >> >>> This is older than the bug report of this thread. All those >>> indications point out that the patch has *not* been commit

Re: [HACKERS] Commits don't block for synchronous replication

2017-11-30 Thread Michael Paquier
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Simon Riggs wrote: > On 23 November 2017 at 11:11, Michael Paquier > wrote: > >> This is older than the bug report of this thread. All those >> indications point out that the patch has *not* been committed. So it >> seems to me that you perhaps committed it to y

Re: [HACKERS] Commits don't block for synchronous replication

2017-11-24 Thread Simon Riggs
On 23 November 2017 at 11:11, Michael Paquier wrote: > This is older than the bug report of this thread. All those > indications point out that the patch has *not* been committed. So it > seems to me that you perhaps committed it to your local repository, > but forgot to push it to the remote. I

Re: [HACKERS] Commits don't block for synchronous replication

2017-11-22 Thread Michael Paquier
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Ashwin Agrawal wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: >> >> On 15 November 2017 at 10:07, Michael Paquier >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Ashwin Agrawal >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/1297/ >>

Re: [HACKERS] Commits don't block for synchronous replication

2017-11-22 Thread Ashwin Agrawal
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: > On 15 November 2017 at 10:07, Michael Paquier > wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Ashwin Agrawal > wrote: > >> > >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/1297/ > >> > >> Am I missing something or not looking at right place, this is

Re: [HACKERS] Commits don't block for synchronous replication

2017-11-22 Thread Simon Riggs
On 15 November 2017 at 10:07, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Ashwin Agrawal wrote: >> >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/1297/ >> >> Am I missing something or not looking at right place, this is marked as >> committed but don't see the change in latest master ? > >

Re: [HACKERS] Commits don't block for synchronous replication

2017-11-14 Thread Michael Paquier
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Ashwin Agrawal wrote: > > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/1297/ > > Am I missing something or not looking at right place, this is marked as > committed but don't see the change in latest master ? Good thing you double-checked. This has been marked as committe

Re: [HACKERS] Commits don't block for synchronous replication

2017-11-14 Thread Ashwin Agrawal
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/1297/ Am I missing something or not looking at right place, this is marked as committed but don't see the change in latest master ?