On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 2:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Not *nearly* as much as I'd object to mostly-breaking postfix operators.
> Now admittedly, if the Berkeley guys had never put those in, nobody
> would miss them. But they're there, and I'm afraid that users are
> likely depending on them. Neithe
Robert Haas writes:
> I think there would be a lot of value in coming up with some kind of
> incremental improvement here; this is a common annoyance for users
> migrating from other database systems (and one in particular).
Agreed, but ...
> Technically, that doesn't look hard to do: (1) remove
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> It's likely that by rejiggering the precedence of productions, we could
> resolve these ambiguities in favor of "it's not a ColLabel if it appears
> in a context like this". And probably that wouldn't be too surprising
> most of the time. But de
