Greetings,
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Unless somebody can prove convincingly that this argument is wrong and
> that there are no other possible problems either, and memorialize that
> argument in the form of a detailed comment, I think we should reject
> this patch.
> http://
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 4:36 AM, Alexander Korotkov
> wrote:
>> +1,
>> FDW looks OK for prototyping pluggable storage, but it doesn't seem suitable
>> for permanent implementation.
>> BTW, Hadi, could you visit "Pluggable storage" thread
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 4:36 AM, Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> +1,
> FDW looks OK for prototyping pluggable storage, but it doesn't seem suitable
> for permanent implementation.
> BTW, Hadi, could you visit "Pluggable storage" thread and check how suitable
> upcoming pluggable storage API is for cst
