Justin Pryzby writes:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 05:36:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm not sure how far to back-patch it -- I think the parallel restore
>> of ACLs behavior is not very old, but we might want to teach older
>> pg_dump versions to insert the extra dependency anyway, for safety.
>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 05:36:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Justin Pryzby writes:
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 04:54:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> This works about 99% of the time, in fact. It falls down in the --clean
>
> > Note that this fails for me (sometimes) even without --clean.
>
> Oh
Justin Pryzby writes:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 04:54:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This works about 99% of the time, in fact. It falls down in the --clean
> Note that this fails for me (sometimes) even without --clean.
Oh, I was thinking that REVOKE would only be issued in the --clean
case, b
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 04:54:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Justin Pryzby writes:
> > I hit this issue intermittently (roughly half the time) while working with a
> > patch David submitted, and finally found a recipe to reproduce it on an
> > unpatched v12 instance.
>
> > I was surprised to see p
Justin Pryzby writes:
> I hit this issue intermittently (roughly half the time) while working with a
> patch David submitted, and finally found a recipe to reproduce it on an
> unpatched v12 instance.
> I was surprised to see pg_restore -j2 is restoring ACLs in pre-data in
> parallel.
It's not p
I hit this issue intermittently (roughly half the time) while working with a
patch David submitted, and finally found a recipe to reproduce it on an
unpatched v12 instance.
I was surprised to see pg_restore -j2 is restoring ACLs in pre-data in
parallel. Note different session IDs and PIDs:
2020-
