Re: "openssl" should not be optional

2025-09-24 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Daniel Gustafsson > > In the meantime, I also got the report that postgresql-17 is not > > failing in that environment, so the problem is new in 18. > > That's odd, off the cuff I don't see anything materially different around this > but I'll do some more digging. It will at least be fixed by

Re: "openssl" should not be optional

2025-09-24 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 24 Sep 2025, at 13:37, Christoph Berg wrote: > > Re: Daniel Gustafsson >> It seems a bit restrictive to require the openssl binary which is test-only, >> since we allow building with ssl but without TAP support (which is where the >> openssl binary is used). > > Ok, but then the error messa

Re: "openssl" should not be optional

2025-09-24 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 24 Sep 2025, at 13:51, Christoph Berg wrote: >> Do you feel like expanding your patch or should I? > > TBH I know very little about how TAP interfaces with the build system, > so that's better with you. Looking at this I was reminded that we already handle this by using a fallback and the

Re: "openssl" should not be optional

2025-09-24 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Daniel Gustafsson > It seems a bit restrictive to require the openssl binary which is test-only, > since we allow building with ssl but without TAP support (which is where the > openssl binary is used). Ok, but then the error messages should be better. This was found because a fellow Debian de