On 20 Jan 2020, 09:45 +0300, Michael Paquier , wrote:
>
> So, I have been looking at this patch by myself, and updated it so as
> the extra slot save is done only if any advancing has been done, on
> top of the other computations that had better be around for
> consistency. The patch includes TAP t
On 2019-09-25 20:48, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
CC Alexey for reasons that become clear below.
Another thing in 0002 is that you're adding a "-R" switch to pg_rewind,
but we have another patch in the commitfest using the same switch for a
different purpose. Maybe you guys need to get to an agreement
Hi hackers,
On 2018-12-27 04:57, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 03:19:06PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
As for REINDEX, I think it's valuable to move tablespace together with
the reindexing. You can already do it with the CREATE INDEX
CONCURRENTLY recipe we recommend, of course
Hi Euler,
On 2019-02-03 13:14, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2018-11-23 13:15:08 -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
Besides the problem presented by Hironobu-san, I'm doing some cleanup
and improving docs. I also forget to declare pg_publication_rel TOAST
table.
Thanks for your review.
As far as I can t
Hi Andrey,
Thank you for the review! I have updated the patch according to your
comments and remarks. Please, find new version attached.
On 2019-01-07 12:12, Andrey Borodin wrote:
Here are some my notes:
1. RestoreArchivedWAL() shares a lot of code with
RestoreArchivedFile(). Is it possible\vi
