10/11/24 01:33, Steve Lau wrote:
>> Before hitting the issue, I thought -1 will be passed if and only if
>> this type does not have type modifiers, as it is indeed unknown. However,
>> it surprises me that it could also be unknown if your type needs
>> type modifiers
# Context
I hit the issue described in this thread when building my toy pgvector
implementation:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/162867790903161317q178e11e6ie276d1254c279dd1%40mail.gmail.com,
TLDR of the thread is that: When you define a new custom type that needs a
type modifier, it is
On Jul 4, 2024, at 4:33 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On 2024-Jul-04, Tom Lane wrote:
"David G. Johnston" writes:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 8:46 PM Steve Lau wrote:
While reading the source code, I noticed comments like "-cim 9/10/89".
It's the initials of the person who
On Jul 4, 2024, at 12:16 PM, David G. Johnston
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 8:46 PM Steve Lau
mailto:stevel...@outlook.com>> wrote:
While reading the source code, I noticed comments like "-cim 9/10/89". I think
this might be an annotation by a developer to indicate the
al context you can provide regarding
these annotations.
Thank you!
Best regards, Steve Lau.
