Hi,
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 11:07 AM Stepan Neretin wrote:
> Hi there! It looks good to me!
>
Thanks!
But I have a question. How is the partialxlogfname freed in case of an
> error?
I'm not sure I understand your question. What kind of error would you
expect exactly?
I mostly added a pfree t
Stefan
From 203747394503b479338980948ccb3df84dc8d1a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Fercot
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 10:57:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v2.] Make XLogFileRead try to restore .partial wal archives
Try to restore the normal archived wal segment first and, if not found, then try to restore the archived
k and thoughts about this patch,
Kind Regards,
--
Stefan FERCOT
Data Egret (https://dataegret.com)
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 10:23 PM Stefan Fercot
wrote:
> Dear hackers,
>
> Generating a ".partial" WAL segment is pretty common nowadays (using
> pg_receivewal or during standb
other, we will only find out how well
it works once people will use it on the field and possibly give some feedback.
As you mentioned in [1], we're not going to start rewriting the implementation
a week after feature freeze nor probably already start building big new things
now anywa
y makes sense to improve the in
core backup capabilities, the more we go in that direction, the more we'll rely
on outside orchestration.
So IMHO it also worth worrying about given more leverage to such orchestration
tools. In that sense, I really like the idea to extend the backup functions.
Mo
tion with COW
> > filesystems.
>
> OK. I'll add this as an open item, for me and Robert.
Thanks for this! It's probably not up to core docs to state all the steps that
would be needed to develop a complete backup solution but documenting the links
between the
ding more info to the backup manifest can be handy for other use-cases
too (i.e. like avoiding to store empty files, or storing the checksums state of
the cluster).
Kind Regards,
--
Stefan FERCOT
Data Egret (https://dataegret.com)
get encouraged to do that faster thanks to incremental backups,
they could detect potential issues sooner.
Ultimately, users will still need their full backups and WAL archives.
If pg_combinebackup fails for any reason, the fix will be to perform the
recovery from the full backup directly.
They still should be able to recover, just slower.
--
Stefan FERCOT
Data Egret (https://dataegret.com)
_receivewal tests only seem to cover the
archives generation but not actually trying to recover using it. I wasn't sure
it was interesting to add such tests right now, so I didn't considered it for
this patch.
Many thanks in advance for your feedback and thoughts about this,
Kind Rega
estore :
/export PGOPTIONS="-c xmloption=DOCUMENT"/.
Do you think of any other way to solve this issue ?
What if we got the 2 xml options used in the database?
Would it be possible to have something like : ALTER TABLE ... ALTER
COLUMN ... SET XML OPTION ...; ?
Kind regards,
--
Stef
10 matches
Mail list logo