The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, passed
Implements feature: tested, passed
Spec compliant: tested, passed
Documentation:not tested
Looks good to me
The new status of this patch is: Ready for Comm
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, passed
Implements feature: tested, passed
Spec compliant: tested, passed
Documentation:not tested
The patch looks fine and successfully fixes the issue of missing
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: not tested
Implements feature: tested, passed
Spec compliant: tested, passed
Documentation:not tested
Other than "Hunk #1 succeeded at 3832 (offset 33 lines)." message whi
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 1:30 PM Bharath Rupireddy <
bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 8:10 PM Muhammad Usama wrote:
> >
> > The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> > make installcheck-world: te
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, passed
Implements feature: tested, passed
Spec compliant: tested, passed
Documentation:not tested
I have tested the patch against current master branch
(commit:67
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, passed
Implements feature: tested, passed
Spec compliant: tested, passed
Documentation:not tested
There are few "Stripping trailing CRs from the patch" and one "Hu
0x00010d1597b9 main + 761
> > 12 libdyld.dylib 0x7fff7161e3d5 start + 1
> > 13 ??? 0x0003 0x0 + 3
> >
>
> Thank you for reporting the issue!
>
> I've attached the latest version pat
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 7:52 PM Masahiko Sawada <
masahiko.saw...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 19:06, Muhammad Usama wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 9:59 AM Masahiko Sawada <
> masahiko.saw...@2ndquadrant.com> wro
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 9:59 AM Masahiko Sawada <
masahiko.saw...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 13:26, Muhammad Usama wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 7:20 AM Masahiko Sawada <
> masahiko.saw...@2ndquadrant.com> wro
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 7:20 AM Masahiko Sawada <
masahiko.saw...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 03:08, Muhammad Usama wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi Sawada,
> >
> > I have just done some review and testing of the patches and have
> > a co
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:45 AM Masahiko Sawada <
masahiko.saw...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 20:43, Masahiko Sawada
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 19:37, Muhammad Usama wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
&g
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:16 AM Masahiko Sawada <
masahiko.saw...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 22:06, Muhammad Usama wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sawada San,
> >
> > I have been further reviewing and testing the transaction involving
> multiple ser
equire to do atomic commit
are capable enough of doing so.
If I am not missing something obvious here, then IMHO the
XACT_FLAGS_FDWNOPREPARE flag should only
be set when the transaction management/two-phase functionality is not available
and "modified" argument is
true in register_fdwx
ot interfere
with these ongoing proposals. Here is a link to one such discussion:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/alpine.DEB.2.21.1907150711080.22273%40lancre
Please feel free to share your thoughts.
Best Regards
...
Muhammad Usama
Highgo Software Canada
URL : http://www.highgo.ca
ADDR: 10318 WHALLEY BLVD, Surrey, BC
new_partition_syntax_poc.diff
Description: Binary data
14 matches
Mail list logo