Re: PATCH pass PGOPTIONS to pg_regress

2018-06-04 Thread Manuel Kniep
> Am 30.05.2018 um 17:22 schrieb Michael Paquier : > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 12:28:27PM +0300, Ildar Musin wrote: >> Here extra.conf is implied to be a file in extension's root directory which >> contains additional server options. >> This would only work for `make check` though, not `make ins

PATCH pass PGOPTIONS to pg_regress

2018-05-29 Thread Manuel Kniep
$(VERSION_NUM) -ge 90600; echo $$?),0) PGOPTIONS+= "--max_parallel_workers_per_gather=0" endif But also when there are many testfiles it might be convenient to align some session parameter globally In the Makefile. Thoughts? Cheers Manuel Kniep 0001-pg_regress-pass-pgoptions.patch D

Re: parallel foreign scan

2018-05-16 Thread Manuel Kniep
> I think you are trying collecting data from multple kafka > server. This means each server has a dedicate foreign table on a > dedicate foreign server. Parallel execution doesn't fit in that > case since it works on single base relation (or a > table). Parallel append/merge append look a bit dif

parallel foreign scan

2018-05-15 Thread Manuel Kniep
Dear hackers, I’m working on a foreign database wrapper for Kafka [1] Now I am trying to make it parallel aware. Following the documentation [2] However it seems that I can’t make it use more than a single worker with force_parallel_mode = on. I wonder if I need to do more than just implementing