On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 04:59:54PM +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
>
> > But we have observed the generated code being pretty grotty and it's caused
> > more than enough confusion - so let's just replace them with plain uint8's
> > and
> > cast in switches.
>
> +1
>
> May be I am wrong, but i
On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 04:08:24PM +0800, JiaoShuntian wrote:
> Hi hackers,
>
> I noticed that PostgreSQL currently supports GB18030 encoding based on the
> older GB18030-2000 standard (as seen in commits like extend GB18030
> conversion). However, China has since updated its mandatory character
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 03:35:19PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Michael Paquier
> > On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 06:54:49PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > > Agreed, it seems very unappealing to remove something so important to
> > > such a
> > > large userbase.
> >
> > Agreed that the so-sa
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 10:53:55AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 2025-04-28 Mo 4:53 PM, Mark Woodward wrote:
> > What are the economics of this? I used PostgreSQL and Cygwin 25 years
> > ago and am amazed it is still a thing.
> > How much effort is it to support PostgreSQL on Cygwin?
> > How
