> On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 at 18:00, KAZAR Ayoub wrote:
> >> Thanks for running that benchmark! Would you mind sharing a reproducer
> >> for the regression you observed?
> >
> > Of course, I attached the sql to generate the text and csv test files.
> > If
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 at 05:25, KAZAR Ayoub wrote:
> >
> > Following Nazir's findings about 4096 bytes being the performant line
> length, I did more benchmarks from my side on both TEXT and CSV formats
> with two different cases of normal data (no special
Following Nazir's findings about 4096 bytes being the performant line
length, I did more benchmarks from my side on both TEXT and CSV formats
with two different cases of normal data (no special characters) and data
with many special characters.
Results are con good as expected and similar to previ
Hi,
I thought it might be interesting to revive this thread because the
improvements i saw from Thomas’s work, and even just simple prefetching of
bucket headers for the probe phase in-memory (to see the effect of
prefetching), are still showing nice improvements. Here are some results
for simple
Hello Hackers,
I am currently looking into the following TODO item, "Have EXPLAIN ANALYZE
issue NOTICE messages when the estimated and actual row counts differ by a
specified percentage."
What's the current status of this TODO, and is there any prior discussion
or rationale behind it ?
Specifically
