*Order is reversed. *
*1.sql*
9.4.19: 20ms
10.5 : 1,227ms
*4.sql*
9.4.19: 13ms
10.5 : 88,721ms
*20.sql*
9.4.19: 271ms
10.5 : 6,104ms
*22.sql*
9.4.19: 8ms
10.5 : 105ms
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 3:15 PM Jinho Jung wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We appreciate you taking time for test! W
*
10.5 : 8ms
9.4.19: 105ms
Jinho Jung
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 9:52 AM Jung, Jinho wrote:
>
> Hello Tom,
>
>
> Sorry for the misleading. Could you try these two queries? I made the
> query even slower in latest version of postgres. These are information
> about how
unnecessary part (i.e., minimize the size of
SQL unless it contains same problem), do you use any tool?
Thanks,
Jinho Jung