like to here you opinion over this implementation.
--
Ivan Kartyshov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Companydiff --git a/doc/src/sgml/mvcc.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/mvcc.sgml
index 73934e5..73975cc 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/mvcc.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/mvcc.sgml
@@ -854,8 +
Given that nobody has updated the patch or even discussed doing so, I
assume this would CF issue should now appropriately be classified as
returned with feedback?
Hello, I now is preparing the patch over syntax that Simon offered. And
in few day I will update the patch.
Thank you for your interest in thread.
--
Ivan Kartyshov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
for ERROR.
Could you give me your ideas over these patches.
--
Ivan Kartyshov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Companydiff --git a/src/backend/catalog/storage.c b/src/backend/catalog/storage.c
index cff49ba..8e6c525 100644
--- a/src/backend/catalog/storage.c
\PhysicalRead when GUC ignore_slru_checksum_failure = false
{default = true}.
I would like to hear your thoughts over my patch.
--
Ivan Kartyshov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Companydiff --git a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
index