Re: Backport "WITH ... AS MATERIALIZED" syntax to <12?

2019-10-19 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 05:01:04AM +0100, Andrew Gierth wrote: > >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Paquier writes: > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:21:30PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > >> However, an alternative would be to backport the new syntax t

Backport "WITH ... AS MATERIALIZED" syntax to <12?

2019-10-18 Thread Colin Watson
exists in 12. Would something like the attached patch against REL_11_STABLE be acceptable? I'd like to backpatch it at least as far as PostgreSQL 10. This compiles and passes regression tests. Thanks, -- Colin Watson[cjwat...@canonical.com] >From 063186e