Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench

2017-11-20 Thread Alik Khilazhev
> I have added the thread to the next CF (January 2018), and marked it as > "ready for committer”. That’s cool, thank you for review! — Thanks and Regards, Alik Khilazhev Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company

Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench

2017-11-20 Thread Alik Khilazhev
a — Thanks and Regards, Alik Khilazhev Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company

Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench

2017-11-20 Thread Alik Khilazhev
times" -> "once”. I am not sure that it need to be fixed in this way, because there can be another number instead of 1. So, I updated it to “%d time(s)” pgbench-zipf-10v.patch Description: Binary data — Thanks and Regards, Alik Khilazhev Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company

Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench

2017-11-19 Thread Alik Khilazhev
sible warning > message in the final report? Also done. But one question: Should it be done by printing to stdout or stderr ? > When/if the pgbench tap test patch get through, coverage tests should > be added. I have added few tests and I am not sure if they OK or not. It was my first e