On Mon, Jan 28, 2019, at 10:25, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 09:05:26AM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > And for plain format, we'd do the same -- sync after each file segment, and
> > then a final one of the directory when done, right?
>
> Well, the code is doing a double am
Hello,
Earlier this week we have split our Postgres 9.6.8 shards, each having two
databases, into one database per shard setup. This was done by promoting
replicas and subsequently removing unused databases.
Immediately afterwards we have discovered repeated 'tuple concurrently updated'
errors on
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017, at 14:52, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> Completely agree, this project can be an improvement for Stolon (or
> Patroni, but I personally never tested or used it, also I got a feeling
> that Google guys will prefer a project that is written in Go). This
> would make much more
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017, at 14:30, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Aleksander,
>
> * Aleksander Alekseev (a.aleks...@postgrespro.ru) wrote:
>
> > Regarding the difficulty of the project - in fact it's not that
> > difficult. Particularly this project can rely on external tools, e.g.
> > use Consul fo
