On Thu, 30 May 2024 at 08:46, Peter Smith wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 7:53 PM vignesh C wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 29 May 2024 at 10:41, Peter Smith wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 6:59 PM vignesh C wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > > c) Don't reset the latch at worker attach and allow l
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 2:09 AM vignesh C wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 May 2024 at 16:30, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> >
> > Hello hackers,
> >
> > As a recent buildfarm test failure [1] shows:
> > [14:33:02.374](0.333s) ok 23 - update works with dropped subscriber column
> > ### Stopping node "publisher"
On 5/29/24 19:53, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
Hi, Andrei!
Thank you for your feedback.
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 11:08 AM Andrei Lepikhov
wrote:
On 5/27/24 19:41, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
Any thoughts?
About 0001:
Having overviewed it, I don't see any issues (but I'm the author),
except gramma
On Wed, 29 May 2024 at 07:02, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> The function *perform_rewind* has an odd undefined behavior.
> The function memcmp/, compares bytes to bytes.
>
> IMO, I think that pg_rewind can have a security issue,
> if two files are exactly the same, they are considered different.
> Becaus
I've built a custom type of index. I implemented an index access method,
but have run into roadblocks. I need to:
1. See the other quals in the where clause.
2. Extract some things from the projection.
3. Insert some things in the projection.
4. Push some aggregations down into the index.
So I st
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 7:53 PM vignesh C wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 May 2024 at 10:41, Peter Smith wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 6:59 PM vignesh C wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > c) Don't reset the latch at worker attach and allow launcher main to
> > > identify and handle it. For this there is a pa
Hi Ranier,
> IMO, I think that pg_rewind can have a security issue,
> if two files are exactly the same, they are considered different.
> Because use of structs with padding values is unspecified.
Logically you are right. But I don't understand what scenario
would require memcmp to compare Cont
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 02:18:19AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > It'd be one thing to continue supporting an almost-guaranteed-to-be-unused
> > platform, if we expected it to become more popular or complete enough to be
> > usable like e.g. risc-v a few years ago. But I doubt
Amit Langote writes:
> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 7:10 PM Alvaro Herrera
> wrote:
>> On 2024-May-27, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I just noticed this behavior, which looks like a bug to me:
>>
>> select json_serialize('{"a":1, "a":2}' returning varchar(5));
>> json_serialize
>>
>> {"a
On Wed, 29 May 2024 at 16:30, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
>
> Hello hackers,
>
> As a recent buildfarm test failure [1] shows:
> [14:33:02.374](0.333s) ok 23 - update works with dropped subscriber column
> ### Stopping node "publisher" using mode fast
> # Running: pg_ctl -D
> /home/bf/bf-build/adder/H
On 25.05.24 04:01, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
Is this the only reason why you're suggesting adding fsync=full,
instead of simply always setting F_FULLFSYNC when fsync=true on MacOS.
If so, I'm not sure we really gain anything by this tri-state. I think
people either care about data loss on power lo
Hi, Andrei!
Thank you for your feedback.
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 11:08 AM Andrei Lepikhov
wrote:
> On 5/27/24 19:41, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 1:19 AM Alexander Korotkov
> > wrote:
> >> While there are some particular use-cases by Jian He, I hope that
> >> above cou
Hi,
Is there someone willing to help me with this development and guide the patch
so that it can be committed one day?
Regards,
Maiquel.
Hello hackers,
As a recent buildfarm test failure [1] shows:
[14:33:02.374](0.333s) ok 23 - update works with dropped subscriber column
### Stopping node "publisher" using mode fast
# Running: pg_ctl -D
/home/bf/bf-build/adder/HEAD/pgsql.build/testrun/subscription/001_rep_changes/data/t_001_rep_
On a particular query, I start an alarm (say for 5 sec) using RegisterTimeout ,
and when the alarm rings, I log something.
This works fine.
But if I run a query with a syntax error between the time duration, then the
alarm never rings.
Is there some code within Postgres that resets/removes the si
On Wed, 29 May 2024 at 10:41, Peter Smith wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 6:59 PM vignesh C wrote:
> >
>
> > c) Don't reset the latch at worker attach and allow launcher main to
> > identify and handle it. For this there is a patch v6-0002 available at
> > [2].
>
> This option c seems the easi
On Fri, 10 May 2024 at 07:39, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
wrote:
>
> Dear Vignesh,
>
> Thanks for raising idea!
>
> > a) Introduce a new latch to handle worker attach and exit.
>
> Just to confirm - there are three wait events for launchers, so I feel we may
> be
> able to create latches per wait eve
On 5/27/24 19:41, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 1:19 AM Alexander Korotkov wrote:
While there are some particular use-cases by Jian He, I hope that
above could give some rationale.
I've assembled patches in this thread into one patchset.
0001 The patch fixing asymmetry in
18 matches
Mail list logo
