On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 1:33 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 11:22 AM shiy.f...@fujitsu.com
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri Jun 17, 2022 11:06 AM shiy.f...@fujitsu.com
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Attached the new version of patch set. I also moved the partitioned table
> > > check
> > > in logi
On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 11:42 PM Robert Haas wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 11:43 AM Masahiko Sawada
> wrote:
> > Another idea I came up with is that we can wait for all index vacuums
> > to finish while checking and updating the progress information, and
> > then calls WaitForParallelWorkers
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 11:22 AM shiy.f...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
>
> On Fri Jun 17, 2022 11:06 AM shiy.f...@fujitsu.com
> wrote:
> >
> > Attached the new version of patch set. I also moved the partitioned table
> > check
> > in logicalrep_rel_mark_updatable() to check_relation_updatable() as
> > di
On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 09:25:48PM +0200, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> Did you initiate a new cluster or otherwise skip the invalid record
> you generated when running the instance based on master? It seems to
> me you're trying to replay the invalid record (len > MaxAllocSize),
> and this patch
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 6:18 PM vignesh C wrote:
>
> Thanks for the comments, the attached v21 patch has the changes for the
> same.
>
Thanks for updating the patch. Here are some comments.
0002 patch
==
1.
+ publisher to only send changes that originated locally. Setting
+
On Saturday, June 18, 2022 3:38 AM Zheng Li wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 12:00 AM Amit Kapila
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 5:44 AM Zheng Li wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > While I agree that the deparser is needed to handle the potential
> > > syntax differences between the pub/sub, I t
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 12:47 PM wangw.f...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 8:13 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> > Few questions/comments on 0001
> > ===
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> > 1.
> > In the commit message, I see: "We also need to allow stream_stop to
> >
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 01:01:37PM +0200, Przemysław Sztoch wrote:
> Two fixes (bad comment and fixed Latin-ASCII.xml).
if codepoint.general_category.startswith('L') and \
- len(codepoint.combining_ids) > 1:
+ len(codepoint.combining_ids) > 0:
So, this one checks for t
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 4:30 PM John Naylor
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 11:57 AM Masahiko Sawada
> wrote:
> > I've attached an updated version patch that changes the configure
> > script. I'm still studying how to support AVX2 on msvc build. Also,
> > added more regression tests.
>
>
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 09:24:56AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I don't feel very strongly about this. It makes sense to stay consistent
> with the existing COPY code.
Yes, my previous argument is based on consistency with the
surroundings. I am not saying that this could not be made better,
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> For PQclear() specifically, one thing that I thought a few days ago
> would be useful would to have it return (PGresult *) NULL. Then the
> very common pattern of doing "PQclear(res); res = NULL;" could be
> simplified to "res = PQclear(res);", which is nicely compact and
On 2022-Jun-17, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> From 355ef1a68be690d9bb8ee0524226abd648733ce0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Peter Eisentraut
> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 12:09:32 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] Remove redundant null pointer checks before PQclear
> and PQconninfofree
>
> These function
12 matches
Mail list logo
