goo
Le 25/04/2022 à 03:27, Nathan Bossart a écrit :
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 10:57:46PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 11:57:05AM +0200, Gilles Darold wrote:
>>> Patch v10 attached.
>> Thanks! I've attached a v11 with some minor editorialization. I think I
>> was able to
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 01:03:20PM +0200, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> Yes, that seems to fix it: I applied that latter patch, and ran my program
> 250x without errors. Then I removed it again an it gave the error within
> 15x.
That looks simple enough, indeed. Andres, are you planning to address
this i
> 22 апр. 2022 г., в 19:15, Bharath Rupireddy
> написал(а):
>
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 10:21 PM Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 12:25 PM Andrey Borodin wrote:
>>> Please excuse me if I'm not attentive enough. I've read this thread. And I
>>> could not find what is the prob
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 01:43:36PM -0500, David Christensen wrote:
> Hi Matthias, great point. Enclosed is a revised version of the patch
> that adds the fork identifier to the end if it's a non-main fork.
Like Alvaro, I have seen cases where this would have been really
handy. So +1 from me, as
seems it's a bug around value 0.
SELECT JSON_OBJECTAGG(k: v ABSENT ON NULL WITH UNIQUE KEYS RETURNING jsonb)
FROM (VALUES (1, 1), (10, NULL),(4, null), (5, null),(6, null),(2, 2))
foo(k, v);
return:
{"1": 1, "2": 2}
SELECT JSON_OBJECTAGG(k: v ABSENT ON NULL WITH UNIQUE KEYS RETURNING jsonb)
FROM
select json_objectagg(
k:v absent on null with unique keys returning text )
from (
values(1,1),(0, null),(3, null),(2,2),(4,null)
) foo(k, v);
return
json_objectagg
--
{ "1" : 1, "2" : 2 }
select json_objectagg(k:v absent on null with unique
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 2:04 AM Zhihong Yu wrote:
> It is okay to keep the formation in your patch.
I modified mark_async_capable_plan() a bit further; 1) adjusted code
in the ProjectionPath case, just for consistency with other cases, and
2) tweaked/improved comments a bit. Attached is a n
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 10:57:46PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 11:57:05AM +0200, Gilles Darold wrote:
>> Patch v10 attached.
>
> Thanks! I've attached a v11 with some minor editorialization. I think I
> was able to improve the error handling for invalid combinations of
On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 2:16 PM I wrote:
> On Thur, Apr 21, 2022 at 5:41 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
> > IIRC, the column list and row filter also have some issues exactly due to
> > this
> > reason, so, I would like those cases to be also mentioned here and probably
> > include the tests for them in t
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 10:21:04AM +0100, Niyas Sait wrote:
> The following error occurs:
>
> LINK : fatal error LNK1246: '/DYNAMICBASE:NO' not compatible with 'ARM64'
> target machine; link without '/DYNAMICBASE:NO
Okay, that's interesting. In light of things like 7f3e17b, that may
be annoying.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 07:17:37PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> Right. We find enough disk space and go to write and suddenly the
> write operations fail for some reason or the VM crashes because of a
> reason other than disk space. I think the foolproof solution is to
> figure out the availab
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 11:40:19PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> On 22 Apr 2022, at 19:01, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>>> Consuming all (both) errors and creating a concatenated string seems
>>> overkill
>>> as it would alter the API from a const error string to something t
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 09:49:34AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I agree that thats a very narrow use case. And I'm not sure the use case of
> a running server is even that important here - it's really the offline one
> that's important. Or rather, the really compelling one is when there is a
> s
On 2022-04-21 Th 17:34, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
>> On 2022-04-21 22:36:01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> Why is Python 3.5 relevant?
>> It's the latest available on some older platforms. It's pretty easy to
>> install
>> a new meson, a heck of a lot more work to install a ne
On 2022-04-24 Su 14:19, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 01:09:08PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> On 2022-04-22 Fr 22:59, Noah Misch wrote:
>>> The MinGW gcc crt*.o files do shell-glob expansion on the arguments before
>>> entering main(). See https://google.com/search?q=mingw+comma
On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 01:09:08PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 2022-04-22 Fr 22:59, Noah Misch wrote:
> > The MinGW gcc crt*.o files do shell-glob expansion on the arguments before
> > entering main(). See https://google.com/search?q=mingw+command+line+glob
> > for
> > various discussion of
On 2022-04-22 Fr 22:59, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 09:12:20AM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 8:06 AM Robert Haas wrote:
>>> I have to say the fact that IPC::Run does shell-glob expansion of its
>>> arguments on some machines and not others seems ludicrous
17 matches
Mail list logo
