On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 03:40:50PM +0100, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> After some time, the client
> crashes with a segfault error. According to him, it consumed around 256MB.
> What's weird is that it works great on Linux, but crashed on AIX.
That almost certainly means he's using a 32-bit binary w
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> 9.2 is how far back crake goes in testing pg_ugrade from old versions,
> so that could well be a convenient stopping point. For older versions
> there is still the possibility of building on older toolchains and
> running on modern ones. Yes it's more cumbersome, but it do
Great. File sync is a Nice extension for me, as I don't know all file
structures.
Thomas Munro schrieb am So., 12. Dez. 2021, 03:48:
> Hi,
>
> While porting some new IO code to lots of OSes I noticed in passing
> that there is now a way to do synchronous fdatasync() on Windows.
> This mechanism
On 12/12/21 05:38, Zhihong Yu wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 8:17 PM Tomas Vondra
> mailto:tomas.von...@enterprisedb.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Attached is a rebased and cleaned-up version of these patches, with more
> comments, refactorings etc. Justin and Zhihong, can you
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 8:17 PM Tomas Vondra
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attached is a rebased and cleaned-up version of these patches, with more
> comments, refactorings etc. Justin and Zhihong, can you take a look?
>
>
> 0001 - Ignore extended statistics for inheritance trees
>
> 0002 - Build inherited ex
Hi,
Attached is a rebased and cleaned-up version of these patches, with more
comments, refactorings etc. Justin and Zhihong, can you take a look?
0001 - Ignore extended statistics for inheritance trees
0002 - Build inherited extended stats on partitioned tables
Those are mostly just Justin's p
I have seen this numerous times but had not dug into it, until now.
If pg_upgrade fails and is re-run, it appends to its logfiles, which is
confusing since, if it fails again, it then looks like the original error
recurred and wasn't fixed. The "append" behavior dates back to 717f6d608.
I think
Hi,
While porting some new IO code to lots of OSes I noticed in passing
that there is now a way to do synchronous fdatasync() on Windows.
This mechanism doesn't have an async variant, which is what I was
actually looking for (which turns out to doable with bleeding edge
IoRings, more on that later
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 2:52 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> I feel one, or both, must be missing something here. My point was that you
> said upthread that the patch doesn't change DEBUG2/non-verbose logging for
> most messages. But the fact that those messages are only emitted inside and if
> (verbose
Hi,
On 2021-12-11 13:13:56 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 12:24 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> > But the ereport is inside an if (verbose), no?
>
> Yes -- in order to report aggressiveness in VACUUM VERBOSE. But the
> autovacuum case still reports verbose-ness, in the same wa
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:05:27PM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
> On 3/24/21 12:04 PM, Jan Wieck wrote:
> > In any case I changed the options so that they behave the same way, the
> > existing -o and -O (for old/new postmaster options) work. I don't think
> > it would be wise to have option forwarding w
Rob Gansevles writes:
> I would like to have a statically linked linux x64 version of postgresql
> 14.1 for creating a distributable sample database.
If you are trying to make the server into a monolithic object, that's
not something we support or have any particular interest in supporting.
Exten
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 1:13 PM Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Yes -- in order to report aggressiveness in VACUUM VERBOSE. But the
> autovacuum case still reports verbose-ness, in the same way as it
> always has -- in that same LOG entry. We don't want to repeat
> ourselves in the VERBOSE case, which wi
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 12:24 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> But the ereport is inside an if (verbose), no?
Yes -- in order to report aggressiveness in VACUUM VERBOSE. But the
autovacuum case still reports verbose-ness, in the same way as it
always has -- in that same LOG entry. We don't want to repea
On 2021-12-11 09:52:29 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 8:30 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> > I think some actually ended up being omitted compared to the previous
> > state. E.g. "aggressively vacuuming ...", but I think others as well.
>
> The "aggressive-ness" is reported by
Hi,
I would like to have a statically linked linux x64 version of postgresql
14.1 for creating a distributable sample database.
I could not find it anywhere for downloading (someone has a link maybe?),
so I tried to build one from the sources.
I am following the instructions on
https://www.postg
"Blake, Geoff" writes:
> Have a tiny patch to add an implementation of spin_delay() for Arm64
> processors to match behavior with x86's PAUSE instruction. See negligible
> benefit on the pgbench tpcb-like workload so at worst it appears to do no
> harm but should help some workloads that exper
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On 07.12.21 21:24, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Um, I definitely gave up too easily there. The one usage in \dp
>> seems to be the*only* thing that breaks in describe.c, and pg_dump
>> doesn't need any changes so far as check-world reveals. So let's
>> just move "char" to anoth
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 8:30 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> I think some actually ended up being omitted compared to the previous
> state. E.g. "aggressively vacuuming ...", but I think others as well.
The "aggressive-ness" is reported by a distinct ereport() with the
patch, so you'll still see that i
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 7:31 AM 曾文旌(义从) wrote:
>
>
> --原始邮件 --
> *发件人:*Tomas Vondra
> *发送时间:*Wed Dec 8 11:26:35 2021
> *收件人:*曾文旌(义从) , shawn wang <
> shawn.wang...@gmail.com>, ggys...@gmail.com ,
> PostgreSQL Hackers
> *抄送:*wjzeng
> *主题:*Re: 回复：Re: Is it worth p
--原始邮件 --
发件人:Tomas Vondra
发送时间:Wed Dec 8 11:26:35 2021
收件人:曾文旌(义从) , shawn wang
, ggys...@gmail.com , PostgreSQL
Hackers
抄送:wjzeng
主题:Re: 回复：Re: Is it worth pushing conditions to sublink/subplan?
Hi,
On 12/7/21 10:44, 曾文旌(义从) wrote:
> Hi Hackers
>
> For
On 12/9/21 12:50, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> In short then, there is a really large gap between 9.1 and 9.2 in terms
> of how hard they are to build on current toolchains. It's kind of
> fortunate that Peter proposed 9.2 rather than some earlier cutoff.
> In any case, I've completely lost interest in t
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 2:32 PM Andres Freund wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-10-30 14:21:01 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Due to bug #17245: [1] I spent a considerably amount of time looking at
> > vacuum
> > related code. And I found a few things that I think could stand improvement:
Thank you fo
On 12/10/21 20:20, Andres Freund wrote:
> The attached patch executes
> SELECT set_config('application_name', current_setting('application_name')
> || '/' || $1, false);
> when establishing connections to deal with that.
Sounds good
>
> As attached this appends "control connection" for the
24 matches
Mail list logo
