On Sunday, September 12, 2021, Jaime Casanova
wrote:
>
>
> So, what is it? the index row size could be upto 8191 or cannot be
> greater than 2704?
>
The wording doesn’t change between the two: The size cannot be greater the
8191 regardless of the index type being used. This check is first,
proba
Hi everyone,
I tried an old test that at some point crashed the database... that is
already fixed.
So now it gives a good ERROR message:
"""
postgres=# create table t1 (col1 text, col2 text);
CREATE TABLE
postgres=# create unique index on t1 ((col1 || col2));
CREATE INDEX
postgres=# insert into
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 10:06:04AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hi
>
> čt 9. 9. 2021 v 12:21 odesílatel Erik Rijkers napsal:
>
> > > [schema-variables-20210909.patch]
> >
> > Hi Pavel,
> >
> > The patch applies and compiles fine but 'make check' for the
> > assert-enabled fails on 131 out of 2
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 06:02:18PM +, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 13:33 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 03:01:43PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > v4-0001 mostly teaches test.sh about specific changes that have to be
> > > made to historic versions of the
Artur Zakirov writes:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 9:27 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm. So that forecloses back-patching this to earlier than v13.
>> On the other hand, given that we've been ignoring the bug for awhile,
>> maybe a fix that only works in v13+ is good enough. (Or maybe by now
>> it'd be sa
Hi Jaime,
> Needs review: 171.
> Waiting on Author: 79.
> Ready for Committer: 15.
>
> How could we advance on the "needs review" queue? It's just too long!
For the record, some patches marked as "Needs review" are in fact
rotted and need to be rebased http://cfbot.cputube.org/ I notified
several
Thank you Tom for your review.
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 9:27 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Artur Zakirov writes:
> > I attached the patch which fixes it in a different way. It calls
> > SignalBackends() in AtCommit_Notify(). It is possible to call
> > SignalBackends()
> > outside of ProcessCompletedNoti
Jaime Casanova writes:
> BTW, this only happens when the third parameter is large. Here is an
> example that consistently crash here:
> select regexp_count('jaime.casanova', 'valid', 102481);
Hah ... pg_regexec has never had a check that the search start position
is sane. Will fix.
Amit Kapila writes:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 7:57 AM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com
> wrote:
>> I found that the patch cannot be applied to back-branches(v10-v14) cleanly,
>> so, I generate the patches for back-branches. Attached, all the patches have
>> passed regression test.
> Pushed!
Shouldn't the
Jacob Champion writes:
> On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 13:33 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>> I started this. I don't know if it's compatible with the buildfarm client,
>> but
>> I think any issues maybe can be avoided by using "IF EXISTS".
> Here are the differences I see on a first pass (without puttin
Hi,
BTW, this only happens when the third parameter is large. Here is an
example that consistently crash here:
select regexp_count('jaime.casanova', 'valid', 102481);
--
Jaime Casanova
Director de Servicios Profesionales
SystemGuards - Consultores de PostgreSQL
Andrey Lepikhov writes:
> But why the Index type still uses for indexing of range table entries?
> For example:
> - we give int resultRelation value to create_modifytable_path() as Index
> nominalRelation value.
> - exec_rt_fetch(Index) calls list_nth(int).
> - generate_subquery_vars() accepts an
Aleksander Alekseev writes:
> +1. The proposed changes will be beneficial in the long term. They
> will affect existing extensions. However, the scale of the problem
> seems to be exaggerated.
Yeah, after thinking more about this I agree we should just do it.
I do not say that David's concerns ab
Anton Voloshin writes:
> On 10/09/2021 01:37, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's sure not very clear to me why one case deserves a message and the
>> other not. Perhaps they both do, which would lead to adding another
>> DEBUG1 message here.
> I'm not an expert in locales, but I think it makes some sense t
Hi hackers!
There's a lot of compression discussions nowadays. And that's cool!
Recently Naresh Chainani in private discussion shared with me the idea to
compress temporary files on disk.
And I was thrilled to find no evidence of implementation of this interesting
idea.
I've prototyped Random A
Hi,
We have two static check_permissions functions (one in slotfuncs.c
another in logicalfuncs.c) with the same name and same code for
checking the privileges for using replication slots. Why can't we have
a single function CheckReplicationSlotPermissions in slot.c? This way,
we can get rid of red
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 11:35 PM Jaime Casanova <
jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 06:04:14PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > On 14/07/2021 15:12, vignesh C wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 3:49 AM Heikki Linnakangas
> wrote:
> > > > Here's an updated versio
17 matches
Mail list logo
