On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 1:30 AM Joe Wildish wrote:
>
> Attached is a small patch for adding "edit-and-execute-command" readline
> support to psql. Bash has this concept and I miss it when using psql. It
> allows you to amend the current line in an editor by pressing "v" (when
> in vi mode) or "C-
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:08 AM Masahiko Sawada
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 13:26, Amit Kapila wrote:
> >
> >
> > /*
> > - * Allocate and initialize walsender-related shared memory.
> > + * Allocate and initialize replication slots' shared memory.
> > */
> >
> > How about changing it to
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:49 PM Robert Haas wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:19 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > My sense is that it would be a lot more sensible to do it at the
> > > *beginning* of the parallel operation. Once we do it once, we
> > > shouldn't ever do it again; that's how it wor
Hi hackers,
Attached is a small patch for adding "edit-and-execute-command" readline
support to psql. Bash has this concept and I miss it when using psql. It
allows you to amend the current line in an editor by pressing "v" (when
in vi mode) or "C-x C-e" (when in emacs mode). Those are the def
Hi, all!
Below is my variant how to patch Gin-Gist weights issue:
1. First of all I propose to shift from previously Gin's own TS_execute
variant and leave only two: TS_execute with bool result and bool type
callback and ternary TS_execute_recurse with ternary callback. I suppose
all legacy consist
On 2020-May-17, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> On 2020-05-17 08:51, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > I don't think that's the general understanding of those terms. For all
> > I know, they *are* synonyms, and there's no specific term for "the
> > fluctuating objects" as you call them. The instance is either ru
In Postgres, Index FILLFACTOR only works for monotonically increasing
column values and for random values it will do 50:50 block split. However
it's really less likely that monotonically increasing columns gets updated
then why we need to waste that 10% space and also making Index range scan
on suc
Hello,
I've merged all time-related stuff (time_t, instr_time, int64) to use a
unique type (pg_time_usec_t) and set of functions/macros, which simplifies
the code somehow.
Hm. I'm not convinced it's a good idea for pgbench to do its own thing
here.
I really think that the refactoring part
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 1:34 PM Alexander Korotkov
wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 1:30 PM Nikita Glukhov
> wrote:
> > I agree that this patch is an improvement.
>
> OK, I'm going to push this patch if no objections.
> (Sergey doesn't seem to continue involvement in PostgreSQL
> development, so
On 2020-05-17 08:51, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On 2020-May-17, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
On 15.05.20 02:00, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Thanks everybody. I have compiled together all the suggestions and the
>
> * I changed "instance", and made "cluster" be mostly a synonym of that.
In my understanding, "ins
On 17.05.20 08:51, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On 15.05.20 02:00, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Thanks everybody. I have compiled together all the suggestions and the
result is in the attached patch. Some of it is of my own devising.
* I changed "instance", and made "cluster" be mostly a synonym of that.
On 17.05.20 08:51, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Any object that
exists in a database is local, regardless of whether it exists in a
schema or not.
This implies that the term "local" is unnecessary, just call them "SQL
object".
"Extensions" is one type of object that does not belong
in a schema. "Fore
On 2020-May-16, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2020-05-16 22:51:50 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > On 2020-May-16, Andres Freund wrote:
> >
> > > I, independent of this patch, added a few additional paths in which
> > > checkpointer's latch is reset, and I found a few shutdowns in regression
13 matches
Mail list logo