Hi
I am not sure if user postgres should be removed, so it is probably bug
pg_dumpall -r -c | grep postgres
DROP ROLE postgres;
CREATE ROLE postgres;
Regards
Pavel
At 2017-12-01 12:27:09, "Michael Paquier" wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 1:20 AM, chenhj wrote:
>> I had filled the authors field of this patch in commitfest, and will rebase
>> this patch if needed. Thank you for your help!
>
>The documentation of the patch needs a rebase, so I am moving it to
David Rowley wrote:
> So, then this patch is only really intended as a syntax shortcut for
> mass adding of indexes to each partition?
This patch is intended to serve as a basis on which to construct further
features, just like every other patch we apply.
> I feel like we could do better here wi
Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 12/01/2017 08:48 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Maybe our dependency code needs to be extended in order to support this.
> > I think the current logic would drop the column if you were to do "DROP
> > COMPRESSION .. CASCADE", but I'm not sure we'd see that as a feature.
>
On 12/02/2017 09:38 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2017-12-02 16:04:52 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> Firstly, it's going to be quite hard (or perhaps impossible) to find an
>> algorithm that is "universally better" than pglz. Some algorithms do
>> work better for text documents, some for bi
Sorry, I apologize.
I though (most) Hackers were not reading General list.
Regards
PAscal
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html
On 12/02/2017 09:24 PM, konstantin knizhnik wrote:
>
> On Dec 2, 2017, at 6:04 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
>> On 12/01/2017 10:52 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> Other algorithms (e.g. zstd) got significantly better compression (25%)
>> compared to pglz, but in exchange for longer compressio
Hi,
On 2017-12-02 13:56:51 -0700, legrand legrand wrote:
> I have a typical star schema, having dimension tables "product", "calendar"
> and "country" and a fact table "sales".
> This fact table is partitionned by time (range by month) and country
> (list).
You've posted nearly the same a few day
On 2017-12-02 15:54:29 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > - Right now RemovePgTempFilesInDir() will recurse into appropriately
> > named directories, and when it recurses it doesn't require the same
> > name pattern checks. I think that's good
Hello,
I have a typical star schema, having dimension tables "product", "calendar"
and "country" and a fact table "sales".
This fact table is partitionned by time (range by month) and country (list).
Will query like:
select product.name, calendar.month, sum(sales.net_price)
from sales
inner joi
Hi,
On 2017-12-02 16:04:52 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Firstly, it's going to be quite hard (or perhaps impossible) to find an
> algorithm that is "universally better" than pglz. Some algorithms do
> work better for text documents, some for binary blobs, etc. I don't
> think there's a win-win opt
On Dec 2, 2017, at 6:04 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 12/01/2017 10:52 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2017-12-01 16:14:58 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> Honestly, if we can give everybody a 4% space reduction by
>>> switching to lz4, I think that's totally worth doing -- but let's
>>> not make peop
Hello,
28.11.2017 20:06, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut writes:
On 11/23/17 15:39, Tom Lane wrote:
I think we should have a discussion about whether it'd be smart
to convert the back branches' documentation to XML as well.
My short answer to that is, I don't have time for that. I don't kn
On 12/01/2017 11:37 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Aleksander Alekseev
>> wrote:
>>> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer
>> Patch moved to CF 2018-01. Perhaps a committer will look at it at
On 12/01/2017 10:52 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-12-01 16:14:58 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Honestly, if we can give everybody a 4% space reduction by
>> switching to lz4, I think that's totally worth doing -- but let's
>> not make people choose it, let's make it the default going forward,
>
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>> That is wrong and I think you have hit a bug. It should be 2974 * 5 =
>>> 14870 as you have seen in other cases. The problem is t
Hello Robert,
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 12:34 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 6:20 AM, Beena Emerson wrote:
>> David Q1:
>> postgres=# explain analyse execute ab_q1 (3,3); --const
>>QUERY PLAN
>> --
17 matches
Mail list logo
