On 03/01/2013 02:31 AM, Albe Laurenz wrote:
> JD Wong wrote:
Hi Adrian, yes I completely copied the config-file and data directories
over.
>
>>> That's guaranteed to break everything badly.
>
>> Even if I "read only style" copied the files? Do you mind elaborating on why
>> this ha
I have a master server and two slave servers, one in the same rack and
one in another data center that has a normal latency of about 15ms.
Both master and slaves are running CentOS 5.6 x86_64 with:
postgresql90-server-9.0.4-1PGDG.rhel5.x86_64 from
http://yum.pgrpms.org
The master server is usin
On 07/25/2011 11:38 AM, Michael Best wrote:
I have the servers configured, and get the replication up and running,
and then it will run for the better part of a day, and then the slaves
appear to stop receiving or requesting updates, there doesn't appear to
be anything in the logs other
Had some database corruption problems today. Since they came on the
heels of making some minor database changes yesterday, they may or may
not be related to that. Centos 4.x, Postgresql 8.1.4
I modified the following settings and then issued a reload.I hadn't
turned up the kernel.shmmax
Thomas F. O'Connell wrote:
On Jan 4, 2007, at 11:24 PM, Michael Best wrote:
When I finally got the error report in the morning the database was in
this state:
$ psql dbname
dbname=# \dt
ERROR: cache lookup failed for relation 20884
Do you have your error logs, and were ther
