column types are the same so I don't know why this 'union all' is failing.
Any ideas?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
here is the error:
ERROR: syntax error at or near "UNION"
LINE 17: UNION ALL
^
** Error **
ERROR: syntax error a
from
storage
where monthly = '11-07'
) as b on a.node=b.node
where
a.accesses is null
and
b.channel = 'olam'
Thanks again for the help.
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joy Smith writes:
> > column types are the same so I don't know why thi
PDATE | SHARE } [ OF table_name [, ...] ] [ NOWAIT ] [...]
]
thanks again.
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 09:28 -0400, Joy Smith wrote:
> > column types are the same so I don't know why this 'union all' is
> failing.
> &g
I finally understand why the query looks like it does, even though it is not
what I wanted. Here is the setup:
Version
"PostgreSQL 9.0.4, compiled by Visual C++ build 1500, 32-bit"
Table Structure
-- Table: modvalues
--
3
thank you for your help and ideas
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Joy Smith
> wrote:
> > I finally understand why the query looks like it does, even though it is
> not
> > what I wanted. Here is the setup:
> >
>You'll want to group by baloons,color and probably take a sum of each of
the case statements.
>Sim
yes, hard to believe I did not notice that. Thank you, the working query
is:
select baloons, color,
max(case when dayofpurchase = '2011-01-01' then amountpur ELSE NULL END) as
"first",
max(CASE w
