[GENERAL] pl/pgSQL variable substitution

2011-02-16 Thread Jeremy Palmer
Hi, I'm creating a pl/pgSQL function that returns a table that has a column name which is the same as a PostgreSQL reserved. In the below example a have returning table with a column called 'desc': CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION bad_func() RETURNS TABLE (bar INTEGER, "desc" VARCHAR(100)) AS $$ BE

[GENERAL] Out of memory

2011-03-24 Thread Jeremy Palmer
I've been getting database out of memory failures with some queries which deal with a reasonable amount of data. I was wondering what I should be looking at to stop this from happening. The typical messages I been getting are like this: http://pastebin.com/Jxfu3nYm The OS is: Linux TSTLHAPP01

Re: [GENERAL] Out of memory

2011-03-26 Thread Jeremy Palmer
memory after each sort operation has completed. Thanks, Jeremy From: Scott Marlowe [scott.marl...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, 25 March 2011 5:04 p.m. To: Jeremy Palmer Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Out of memory On Thu, Mar 24, 2011

Re: [GENERAL] Out of memory

2011-03-28 Thread Jeremy Palmer
any given time. Thanks, Jeremy -Original Message----- From: Jeremy Palmer Sent: Saturday, 26 March 2011 9:57 p.m. To: Scott Marlowe Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: RE: [GENERAL] Out of memory Hi Scott, It was the work_mem that was set too high. I reduced it to 32mb and the

[GENERAL] Out of memory

2011-04-05 Thread Jeremy Palmer
ameter to sensible values given the hardware and database utilization. 2) Can anyone help me make sense of the top transaction memory error to help track down the issue? Any other suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Jeremy ________ From: Jeremy Palmer Sen

Re: [GENERAL] Out of memory

2011-04-05 Thread Jeremy Palmer
Hi John, > Does that all really have to be a single transaction? Yes - I need to ensure that of the changesets and denormalised tables are created in the same transaction, so that if an error occurs the database is rolled back to the last successfully applied changeset. I don't want to get int

Re: [GENERAL] Out of memory

2011-04-05 Thread Jeremy Palmer
Hi Jeff, < Where is the source to the function?  The source is located here: https://github.com/linz/linz_bde_uploader The main function LDS_MaintainSimplifiedLayers that is being called is on line 37 is in https://github.com/linz/linz_bde_uploader/blob/master/sql/lds_layer_functions.sql. T

Re: [GENERAL] Out of memory

2011-04-12 Thread Jeremy Palmer
e would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Jeremy ____ From: Jeremy Palmer Sent: Tuesday, 5 April 2011 9:50 p.m. To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Out of memory Hi, I've been having repeated troubles trying to get a PostgreSQL app to play nicely on Ubu

[GENERAL] 9.0 Out of memory

2011-04-12 Thread Jeremy Palmer
Hi All, I running PostgreSQL 9.0.3 and getting an out of memory error while running a big transaction. This error does not crash the backend. The nature of this transaction is it is sequentially applying data updates to a large number (104) of tables, then after applying those updates, a serie

Re: [GENERAL] 9.0 Out of memory

2011-04-13 Thread Jeremy Palmer
ULL, guarantee_status TEXT NOT NULL, estate_description TEXT, number_owners INT8 NOT NULL, part_share BOOLEAN NOT NULL, shape GEOMETRY, ); CREATE INDEX shx_title_shape ON titles USING gist (shape); Thanks, Jeremy From: Tom Lane [t...@sss.pgh

Re: [GENERAL] 9.0 Out of memory

2011-04-13 Thread Jeremy Palmer
> No, given the info from the memory map I'd have to say that the leakage > is in the cursor not in what you do in the plpgsql function. The cursor > query looks fairly unexciting except for the cast from geometry to text. > I don't have PostGIS installed here so I can't do any testing, but I > wo

[GENERAL] SSO Windows-to-unix

2015-01-12 Thread Jeremy Palmer
Hi All, I'm just investigating the option for configuring SSO for windows clients connecting to a PostgreSQL 9.3 server installed on Ubuntu 14.04. Our windows environment uses a Windows 2012 domain controller. The best information I could find on this subject was http://www.hagander.net/talks/

Re: [GENERAL] SSO Windows-to-unix

2015-01-13 Thread Jeremy Palmer
I think PgAdmin is just a client that uses libpq and does not specifically help with SSO. From: Raghu Ram [mailto:raghuchenn...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 13 January 2015 10:22 p.m. To: Jeremy Palmer Subject: Re: [GENERAL] SSO Windows-to-unix On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Jeremy Palmer

Re: [GENERAL] SSO Windows-to-unix

2015-01-18 Thread Jeremy Palmer
Anybody have an help on this topic? Thanks Jeremy From: Guillaume Lelarge [guilla...@lelarge.info] Sent: Wednesday, 14 January 2015 8:20 p.m. To: Jeremy Palmer Cc: PostgreSQL General; raghuchenn...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [GENERAL] SSO Windows-to-unix Le

Re: [GENERAL] SSO Windows-to-unix

2015-01-27 Thread Jeremy Palmer
Sorry to ask again, but I still have not got any reply to this. Maybe this indicates it’s a bad option? > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Jeremy Palmer > mailto:jpal...@linz.govt.nz>> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'm just investigating the option for

[GENERAL] HTTP user authentication against PostgreSQL

2015-01-29 Thread Jeremy Palmer
I'm setting up an apache server and was wondering if it is possible to setup HTTP user authentication against PostgreSQL authentication? I see http://www.giuseppetanzilli.it/mod_auth_pgsql2/, but that requires a custom username table. I want to be able to leverage the PostgreSQL Authentication

Re: [GENERAL] HTTP user authentication against PostgreSQL

2015-01-30 Thread Jeremy Palmer
David G Johnston wrote > Personally, I would consider having both Apache and PostgreSQL talk to a > LDAP database if you really need to have a single point of identity > definition. The PostgreSQL DB is currently setup with Kerberos for Windows SSO, as well as MD5 password authentication for an

Re: [GENERAL] HTTP user authentication against PostgreSQL

2015-01-30 Thread Jeremy Palmer
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] HTTP user authentication against PostgreSQL On 1/30/2015 12:31 AM, Jeremy Palmer wrote: > The PostgreSQL DB is currently setup with Kerberos for Windows SSO, as well > as MD5 password authentication for another pool of other PostgreSQL users who > are not part of o

[GENERAL] Generate documentation from PL/pgsql source code?

2013-06-29 Thread Jeremy Palmer
I maintain large libraries of files containing PL/pgsql code which I would like to document better. Are there any tools currently available that can generate documentation from PL/pgsql source code? Would be good if it had functionality like doxygen. e.g /** * my function comment.. * * @param p

Re: [GENERAL] 9.0 Out of memory

2011-04-14 Thread Jeremy Palmer
>> Ok I removed the geometry column from the cursor query within the function >> and the session still runs out of memory. I'm still seeing the same error >> message as well: >> PortalHeapMemory: 16384 total in 4 blocks; 5944 free (0 chunks); 10440 >> used >> ExecutorState: 122880 to

[GENERAL] Windows SIngle Sign On - LINUX Server

2012-08-23 Thread Jeremy Palmer
Hi All, We are currently running PostgreSQL 8.4 on Windows server 2003 and are planning to move the instance to Ubuntu 10.4 - yay!. At the same time we will also upgrade to 9.1. One nice features that we leverage from the windows configuration is the ability for windows clients to use AD SSO i.

Re: [GENERAL] Windows SIngle Sign On - LINUX Server

2012-08-24 Thread Jeremy Palmer
00 a.m. To: Craig Ringer Cc: Jeremy Palmer; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Windows SIngle Sign On - LINUX Server In real world deployment, LDAP and Kerbero are often combined for authentication and authorization. The link below is a well documented howto: https://help.ubuntu.com

[GENERAL] Win32 Backend Cash - pre-existing shared memory block is still in use

2010-08-17 Thread Jeremy Palmer
I'm getting infrequent backend crashes on a windows instance of PostgreSQL. The error I get is in the log below. It seems to relate to the share memory each time. Does anyone have any ideas what the problem is here, or what additional things I can do to get more information out next time the ba

Re: [GENERAL] Win32 Backend Cash - pre-existing shared memory block is still in use

2010-08-18 Thread Jeremy Palmer
No they all got killed off. -Original Message- From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:mag...@hagander.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 8:06 PM To: Jeremy Palmer Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Win32 Backend Cash - pre-existing shared memory block is still in use On

Re: [GENERAL] Win32 Backend Cash - pre-existing shared memory block is still in use

2010-08-18 Thread Jeremy Palmer
t for another crash. Should I set the level to 'debug5'? The cluster is for development purposes, so I don't mind the overhead. Cheers, Jeremy -Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:07 AM To: Alvaro Herrera Cc: Jeremy P

Re: [GENERAL] Win32 Backend Cash - pre-existing shared memory block is still in use

2010-08-19 Thread Jeremy Palmer
x27;m willing provide more information to help diagnose this. Regards, Jeremy -Original Message- From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:mag...@hagander.net] Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 1:46 AM To: Tom Lane Cc: Jeremy Palmer; pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Alvaro Herrera Subject: Re: [GENERAL]

Re: [GENERAL] Win32 Backend Cash - pre-existing shared memory block is still in use

2010-08-24 Thread Jeremy Palmer
-Original Message- From: Jeremy Palmer Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 1:52 PM To: 'Magnus Hagander'; Tom Lane Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Alvaro Herrera; Chris Crook Subject: RE: [GENERAL] Win32 Backend Cash - pre-existing shared memory block is still in use Yes I do re

Re: [GENERAL] Win32 Backend Cash - pre-existing shared memory block is still in use

2010-08-24 Thread Jeremy Palmer
session can create large temp tables. Thanks Jeremy -Original Message- From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:scott.marl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 5:11 PM To: Jeremy Palmer Cc: Magnus Hagander; Tom Lane; pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Alvaro Herrera Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Win32

Re: [GENERAL] Win32 Backend Cash - pre-existing shared memory block is still in use

2010-08-24 Thread Jeremy Palmer
Yeah that's what stated here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms189334.aspx But only if I add /3gb switch to the kernel boot parameters -Original Message- From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:scott.marl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 5:28 PM To: Tom Lane Cc: J

Re: [GENERAL] Win32 Backend Cash - pre-existing shared memory block is still in use

2010-08-24 Thread Jeremy Palmer
: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 5:34 PM To: Jeremy Palmer Cc: Tom Lane; Magnus Hagander; pgsql-general@postgresql.org; Alvaro Herrera Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Win32 Backend Cash - pre-existing shared memory block is still in use I would be WAY cheaper in time and effort, to just build a simple 64 bit linux

[GENERAL] DISTINCT ON

2005-11-18 Thread Jeremy Palmer
Hi, I have a table: observation ( id int4 NOT NULL [PRIMARY KEY], vector_id NOT NULL [FORGIEN KEY], obs_type VARCHAR(4) NOT NULL, date TIMESTAMP NULL ) I need to select the newest observation id, classify by type, for each vector (there can be multiple observation ids on each vector)

Re: [GENERAL] DISTINCT ON

2005-11-18 Thread Jeremy Palmer
Sorry I posted this to the wrong list. I have now reposted this is pgsql-sql. -Original Message- From: Jeremy Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 19 November 2005 11:05 a.m. To: 'pgsql-general@postgresql.org' Subject: DISTINCT ON Hi, I have a table: observati