On Tue, 21 May 2013 11:40:55 +1000, Toby Corkindale wrote:
>>> While it is important to let the SSD know about space that can be
>>> reclaimed, I gather the operation does not perform well. I *think*
>>> current advice is to leave 'discard' off the mount options, and instead
>>> run a nightly cron
On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 10:07:32 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Amber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We know PostgreSQL uses one dedicated server process to serve one client
>> connection, what we want to know is whether PostgreSQL use multiple threads
>> inside agents pr
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:47:15 -0500, Guy Rouillier wrote:
> To answer your question directly, you won't find a prepackaged solution to
> running simultaneous version of PG (or any other software package) on
> Gentoo. That's not how Gentoo is designed to be used. Having said that,
You are contrad
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:41:35 +0200, Andrus wrote:
> Greg,
>
>> You need to get one of the experimental builds that include slotted
>> support. Take a look at
>> http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/postgresql/wiki/ExperimentalFAQ and the
>> page linked to by the blog article you mentioned at
>> http:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:33:26 -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
> You need to get one of the experimental builds that include slotted
> support. Take a look at
> http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/postgresql/wiki/ExperimentalFAQ and the
> page linked to by the blog article you mentioned at
> http://dev-zero.c
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:10:26 +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
> Harald Armin Massa wrote:
>
>> 4.) it seems to be no longer "cool" to have your data below Program
>> Files / Program Files (x86)
That was never cool or good practice.
> I'm not sure which directory should we create $PGDATA -- "My D
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:17:30 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Holger Hoffstaette wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:10:26 +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not sure which directory should we create $PGDATA -- "My Documents",
>>> "A
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:28:31 +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> Nicest would be ofcourse a niceness level, so that VACUUM slows itself
> down according to the amount of queries going on (to a minimum ofcourse).
Linux has IO priority support for this, see ionice. Starting with 2.6.28
the CFQ s
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:51:18 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> one second it took to move the mail to my spam folder. Yes, we all know
> how annoying and stupid spam is but there is a human element here that
> puts things in slightly different light, don't you think?
Absolutely! I'd like to know ho
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:48:15 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does anyone know of any apps using PostgreSQL to archive their personal
> email and make it searchable? And that runs on Mac OS X?
http://www.dbmail.org/ ?:)
-h
---(end of broadcast)---
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 07:31:36 -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 05:22:40PM +0400, Ivan Zolotukhin wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Does anybody know good comparison/review article of XML support in major
>> RDMBSes? I know that PostgreSQL's XML capabilities are quite weak, but
>> how far
On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 14:04:28 +0200, Philipp Ott wrote:
> (..snippetysnip..)
> I just wanted to know - I would like to have universal binaries of libpg
> and psql to deploy.
>
>
> Currently 8.1.3 compiles and runs just fine on OSX 10.4.6 + XCode 2.2.1,
> but generates binaries just for the curren
On Thu, 25 May 2006 08:55:51 +0200, Sim Zacks wrote:
> Does anybody know when postgresql 8.1 will be considered stable on gentoo
> for x86?
No, maybe ask in gentoo-users or -dev? Anyway just because it's not marked
"stable" does not mean it isn't. It's very unfortunate that distributions
have ado
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 12:56:09 +0200, Holger Klawitter wrote:
> Oh please. Reiser is as unstable as postgres is slow - in other words,
> both have to suffer prejudice which used to be true lng ago. ;-)
True.
> In cases of large directories ext2/3 perform extremely bad (as in the
> original pos
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:13:01 -0700, Jonathan Barnhart wrote:
> Is there any chance I can get a pre-release executable of the Windows
> native Postgresql so I can start doing some application development? I do
> not intend to deploy a buggy postgres, but even if it goes boom
> occasionally it will
15 matches
Mail list logo
