d that
- the dictionary table already consists of ~200K records
- the patch could be ~1-50K of records long
- records could not be removed from the dictionary, only added if not exist
Thanks!
--
Eugene Dzhurinsky
pgpsmOWtdvXCS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
uot; table on
"series" column. But perhaps it's better to try this and if a performance will
go really bad - then do some optimizations, like partitioning etc.
Thank you!
--
Eugene Dzhurinsky
pgp4hwQD7LkHm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ks really promising, thank you John! I need only one index on the
"patch_data" table, and I will re-use the existing index on the "dictionary".
Thanks again!
--
Eugene Dzhurinsky
pgpY2gxa8nKur.pgp
Description: PGP signature
eter. Then truncate existing dictionary table and COPY the data from the
merged file into it.
Is it what you've meant?
Thank you!
--
Eugene Dzhurinsky
pgpQFsOplL4EJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello!
I have a huge dictionary table with series data generated by a third-party
service. The table consists of 2 columns
- id : serial, primary key
- series : varchar, not null, indexed
From time to time I need to apply a "patch" to the dictionary, the patch file
consists of "series" data, one