For my particular case, word repetition shouldn't be relevant in determining
the rank of a document. If I strip() the vector, I loose what relevance
proximity and weight add to the rank. It seems impossible, yet I ask anyway: Is
it possible to eliminate the second (third, fourth, fifth, etc.) occur
You want
http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/uniqueidentifier/projdisplay.php
CG
--- Ivar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How to generate GUID("f741d0ce-351c-4c8d-9625-d23765ca7f45") values in
> postgre ?
>
>
>
>
> ---(end of broadcast)-
COPY works for whole tables, and can't append rows. You're going to have to
escape your linebreaks and tabs to use COPY ... As I recall, you can specify
your own custom column and row delimiters... You might consider creating some
type of primary key for the table. A "serial" column would work fin
PostgreSQL 7.4.2 ... The tables in question have been vacuumed.
...stepping gingerly into the woods of foreign keys... I need some advice:
Given a foriegn key structure:
table1.p1 uniqueidentifier
table2.p1 uniqueidentifier
table3.p1 uniqueidentifier
table4.p1 uniqueidentifier
table4.q1 uniqueid
Slightly off topic for this thread... I figured I give it a whirl...
I've often wondered what sort of performance increase one would get by placing
the WAL on a solid-state drive like a 2 or 4GB TiGi. Has anyone tested this
type of setup for a performance gain? For a 2GB drive it runs ~$3000. It
pg_dump: query to get data of sequence "profile_id_seq" returned name
"profiles_id_seq"
I renamed a sequence using PgAdmin II from profiles_id_seq to profile_id_seq.
Any suggestions on getting everything synched to the proper names again?
CG
__
Do you Yahoo!?
SB