[GENERAL] main.log file not being updated

2013-01-24 Thread Anson Abraham
my postgresql-9.0-main.log log file is 0 bytes. Postgres user has perms to write to it. And and postgresql.conf file shows to log, but it's not. Not sure why. I have the defaults set in except for these changes: log_connections = on log_disconnections = on log_duration = off log_line_prefix =

Re: [GENERAL] main.log file not being updated

2013-01-24 Thread Anson Abraham
restart or rather reload of the config file. Also when I did an LSOF of the file, nothing was locking it ... ie usually postgres would be the one, but not in this case. On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote: > On 01/24/2013 09:29 AM, Anson Abraham wrote: > >> my postgr

Re: [GENERAL] main.log file not being updated

2013-01-24 Thread Anson Abraham
t;. it's a head scratcher for me. On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote: > On 01/24/2013 12:44 PM, Anson Abraham wrote: > >> i've always had logging_collector off. it would still log query / >> transactions that failed to the "syslog" >&

Re: [GENERAL] main.log file not being updated

2013-01-28 Thread Anson Abraham
ng of the instance, but that's something I don't have luxury of doing until the next maintanence window, which will be a ways in the future. Thanks, -Anson On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote: > On 01/25/2013 09:00 AM, Anson Abraham wrote: > >> identical

[GENERAL] postgresql log file not getting update

2013-02-28 Thread Anson Abraham
My postgresql-9.0-main.log file has suddenly stopped getting updated. I do not know why it stopped all of a sudden. We made a slight modification where changed in the postgresql.conf param: From log_connections = off log_disconnections = off To log_connections = on log_disconnections = on I'm

Re: [GENERAL] postgresql log file not getting update

2013-02-28 Thread Anson Abraham
nd did a reload, postgres created the log file. So not sure what is going on exactly. Again, any help would be appreciated here to figure this out, where I don't need to restart the db. Thanks On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Anson Abraham wrote: > My postgresql-9.0-main.log file has sud

Re: [GENERAL] postgresql log file not getting update

2013-02-28 Thread Anson Abraham
how is that different from /etc/init.d/postgres reload or for that matter select pg_reload_conf() ? Which I execute both and they don't work either. On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Chris wrote: > > > On Feb 28, 2013, at 19:01, Anson Abraham wrote: > > *Note when I chan

Re: [GENERAL] postgresql log file not getting update

2013-02-28 Thread Anson Abraham
db1 and db4 are 2 separate machines. no other instances of PG running on the box, doing a pg_ctl reload did nothing as well. Also looking @ all proecsses running, only PG instance on the box. On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote: > On 02/28/2013 08:19 AM, Anson Abraham wr

Re: [GENERAL] postgresql log file not getting update

2013-02-28 Thread Anson Abraham
estination to stderr doesn't work, however syslog does. By that i assumed then that it must've been a perms issue, but doesn't look to be the case. Heck i even put the file and folder as chmod 777 and still nothing. On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote: > On 02

[GENERAL] streaming replication: could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer

2013-10-18 Thread Anson Abraham
I'm on Debian Wheezy running postgres 9.3 both boxes are identical. I see in log file on slaves: LOG: could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer OpenSSL is the same version on master and slaves. The libssl is also too. I set ssl_renegotiation=0. So not sure why i'm seeing

Re: [GENERAL] streaming replication: could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer

2013-10-22 Thread Anson Abraham
issue. The one difference between the two slaves, the slave w/ the message is a VM. But other master dbs i have w/ slaves (that are VMs) and have no issues. So it's kind of odd, that this message occurs. On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Albe Laurenz wrote: > Anson Abraham wrote: > > I