Thank you Chris for looking at my issue in such detail.
Yes, the parallel feature rocks.
Regards,
Thomas Güttler
Am 19.08.2016 um 22:40 schrieb Chris Mair:
On 19/08/16 10:57, Thomas Güttler wrote:
What do you think?
I store most of my logs in flat textfiles syslog style, and use grep fo
Am 19.08.2016 um 19:59 schrieb Andy Colson:
On 8/19/2016 2:32 AM, Thomas Güttler wrote:
I want to store logs in a simple table.
Here my columns:
Primary-key (auto generated)
timestamp
host
service-on-host
loglevel
msg
json (optional)
I am unsure which DB to choose: Postgres, E
John, Michael,
Thanks for suggestion for upgrade. I know that's the way to go, but it's not so
easy due to circumstances on my side.
Meanwhile, could you tell me what is this "global/pg_filenode.map" for?
Regards,
Tatsuki
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresq
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Tatsuki Kadomoto
wrote:
> Thanks for suggestion for upgrade. I know that's the way to go, but it's not
> so easy due to circumstances on my side.
Well, I guess it depends on how much you care about your data.
> Meanwhile, could you tell me what is this "global/pg
Michael,
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Tatsuki
From: Michael Paquier
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 5:02:40 PM
To: Tatsuki Kadomoto
Cc: John R Pierce; PostgreSQL mailing lists
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] incorrect checksum detected on "global/pg_filenode.map"
when
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, 3:40 p.m. Thomas Güttler,
wrote:
>
>
> Am 19.08.2016 um 19:59 schrieb Andy Colson:
> > On 8/19/2016 2:32 AM, Thomas Güttler wrote:
> >> I want to store logs in a simple table.
> >>
> >> Here my columns:
> >>
> >> Primary-key (auto generated)
> >> timestamp
> >> host
> >
On 8/22/2016 2:39 AM, Thomas Güttler wrote:
Am 19.08.2016 um 19:59 schrieb Andy Colson:
On 8/19/2016 2:32 AM, Thomas Güttler wrote:
I want to store logs in a simple table.
Here my columns:
Primary-key (auto generated)
timestamp
host
service-on-host
loglevel
msg
json (optional)
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Tatsuki Kadomoto
> wrote:
>> Thanks for suggestion for upgrade. I know that's the way to go, but it's not
>> so easy due to circumstances on my side.
>
> Well, I guess it depends on how much you care about
Hi,
I am trying to model a social login application. The application can
support multiple login providers. I am thinking of creating a custom type for
each provider. e.g.
CREATE TYPE system.google_user AS (
email TEXT
);
CREATE TYPE system.facebook_user AS (
id TEXT
);
And having
My greetings to everybody!
I recently faced with the observation which I can not explain. Why
insertion throughput can be reduced with an increase of batch size?
Brief description of the experiment.
- PostgreSQL 9.5.4 as server
- https://github.com/sfackler/rust-postgres library as client
Didn't mean to give the impression I'm 'shouting' :) just wanted to make sure
other users will notice my reply.
But you're right! it does. It even disregards the order of the rows. For
some reason in a previous test I looked to me like it didn't.
--
View this message in context:
http://postgres
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Silk Parrot wrote:
>
> However, the above create table query reports syntax error:
>
> ERROR: syntax error at or near "."
> LINE 10: UNIQUE (google_user.email)
>
> Is there a way to create unique constraint on a field inside composite
> type?
>
Not tested h
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 11:53 PM, Павел Филонов wrote:
> My greetings to everybody!
>
> I recently faced with the observation which I can not explain. Why
> insertion throughput can be reduced with an increase of batch size?
>
> Brief description of the experiment.
>
>- PostgreSQL 9.5.4 as se
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 23:02:53 -0700,
Silk Parrot wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to model a social login application. The application can
support multiple login providers. I am thinking of creating a custom type for
each provider. e.g.
CREATE TABLE user (
uuid UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT pub
On 08/17/2016 11:02 PM, Silk Parrot wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to model a social login application. The application can
support multiple login providers. I am thinking of creating a custom
type for each provider. e.g.
CREATE TYPE system.google_user AS (
email TEXT
);
CREATE TYPE system.face
On 08/21/2016 11:53 PM, Павел Филонов wrote:
My greetings to everybody!
I recently faced with the observation which I can not explain. Why
insertion throughput can be reduced with an increase of batch size?
Brief description of the experiment.
* PostgreSQL 9.5.4 as server
* https://github.
Adrian Klaver writes:
> On 08/17/2016 11:02 PM, Silk Parrot wrote:
>> CREATE TABLE user (
>> uuid UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT public.uuid_generate_v4(),
>> google_user system.google_user,
>> facebook_user system.facebook_user,
>> UNIQUE (google_user.email)
>> );
>> ERROR: syntax error at or near "."
Hi guys,
I'm doing a pg_dump and a pg_restore on the same command, using different
usernames and databases names.:
pg_dump --format=custom -v --no-password --no-owner --username=teste1
> --dbname=test1 --host=11.11.11.11 | pg_restore -v --schema=public
> --no-password --no-owner --username=maste
Patrick B writes:
> I'm doing a pg_dump and a pg_restore on the same command, using different
> usernames and databases names.:
> ...
> But I'm getting some permissions errors:
> could not execute query: ERROR: role "devel" does not exist
If that's from
> REVOKE ALL ON SCHEMA public FROM devel;
On 08/22/2016 06:23 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Adrian Klaver writes:
On 08/17/2016 11:02 PM, Silk Parrot wrote:
CREATE TABLE user (
uuid UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT public.uuid_generate_v4(),
google_user system.google_user,
facebook_user system.facebook_user,
UNIQUE (google_user.email)
);
ERROR: syntax
20 matches
Mail list logo
