> From: Medhavi Mahansaria
>To: Adrian Klaver
>Cc: "pgsql-general@postgresql.org"
>Sent: Tuesday, 17 March 2015, 14:30
>Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Reg: PL/pgSQL commit and rollback
>
>
>
>Yes. I have read this document.
>
>But my issue is that even when it throws
and exception I need to rollbac
Is the Windows graphical installer still available? The "download" link
from http://www.postgresql.org/download/windows/ gives a "Page not found"
error.
--
Tim Rowe
Interesting. I can bring that page up on my work system. I clicked on
it from your email address just now. My work PC is running Windows 7.
My email reader is the web based reader at mail.google.com. I'm using
Google Chrome browser.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Tim Rowe wrote:
> Is the Window
It now comes up with a maintenance page for me (with installation links),
so that's ok, something is happening. It looks as if I just chose a bad
time to install Postgres. Thanks :)
On 18 March 2015 at 11:46, John McKown wrote:
> Interesting. I can bring that page up on my work system. I clicked
OOPS, I clicked on the download link on that page to go to:
http://www.enterprisedb.com/products-services-training/pgdownload#windows
and _it_ said "Down for Maintenance" But had a link to:
http://get.enterprisedb.com/postgresql/postgresql-9.3.4-3-windows.exe
http://get.enterprisedb.com/postgresql/
What do you guys do to namespace your functions so that they are not
jumbled in with the system functions and also somewhat hierarchically
organized.
Obviously it's possible to create schemas for different namespaces but that
can lead to a lot of schemas which hold no data. The other way is to
s
I don't understand. What is wrong with having a schema which holds no data?
Schemas are cheap.
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Uckun"
To: "pgsql-general"
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 6:56:55 PM
Subject: [GENERAL] Name spacing functions and stored procedures
What do you guys do
On Wednesday, March 18, 2015, WadeDare4703 wrote:
> I don't understand. What is wrong with having a schema which holds no
> data? Schemas are cheap.
>
> --
> *From: *"Tim Uckun" >
> *To: *"pgsql-general" >
> *Sent: *Wednesday, March 18, 2015 6:56:55 PM
> *Subject:
Dear Users,
I have lots of data in my DB. I need to do archeiving and purging of my
data.
Can anyone please help me with step by step riles?
Thanks in Advance.
Aditya Kumar
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.nabble.com/Archeiving-and-Purging-tp5842393.html
Sent from the Post
On 3/18/2015 7:20 AM, adityagis wrote:
I have lots of data in my DB. I need to do archeiving and purging of my
data.
Can anyone please help me with step by step riles?
like this?
select * from table where datefield < current_date-interval '6 months';
delete from table where datefield < curre
On Wednesday, March 18, 2015, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 3/18/2015 7:20 AM, adityagis wrote:
>
>> I have lots of data in my DB. I need to do archeiving and purging of my
>> data.
>> Can anyone please help me with step by step riles?
>>
>
> like this?
>
> select * from table where datefield < cur
Hi
2015-03-19 2:56 GMT+01:00 Tim Uckun :
> What do you guys do to namespace your functions so that they are not
> jumbled in with the system functions and also somewhat hierarchically
> organized.
>
> Obviously it's possible to create schemas for different namespaces but
> that can lead to a lot
Hi All,
For our next set of development activities in PostgreSQL, we want to
use the Unicode organization code with PostgreSQL to open source that
feature. Is the Unicode license is compatible with PostgreSQL.
The following is the header that is present in one of the Unicode files.
/*
* Copyrig
I have installed Postgres 9.0 in my machine. When I look at Programs and
Features under Control Panel,
I see the Size for Postgres 9.0 is shown as 121GB.
I feel neither the installation or the small postgres databases I would have
created use 121GB.
Any reason why it shows 121GB
Regards
NS
14 matches
Mail list logo
