All,
I have a Rails application on 9.3 in which I want to enforce a unique
index on a set of fields, one of which includes a NULL-able column.
According to
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/indexes-unique.html, btree
indexes can't handle uniqueness on NULL columns, so I'm looking for
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Peter Hicks
wrote:
> All,
>
> I have a Rails application on 9.3 in which I want to enforce a unique
> index on a set of fields, one of which includes a NULL-able column.
>
> According to http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/indexes-unique.html,
> btree indexe
Hi John
On 17/01/15 12:39, John McKown wrote:
I read the above. As I understand it, you can have a unique index on
a column which is NULL-able. That will guarantee that all the non-NULL
values are unique. What it will not guarantee is that there will be at
most one NULL value in the indexed c
Peter Hicks wrote:
> All,
>
> I have a Rails application on 9.3 in which I want to enforce a unique
> index on a set of fields, one of which includes a NULL-able column.
>
> According to
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/indexes-unique.html, btree
> indexes can't handle uniqueness
Hi,
(Is this mailing list right mailing list for asking this
question...?)
Is there any plan to implement PostgreSQL API to implement
WAL supported extension?
Background:
I'm writing an extension(*) that provides index module for CJK
ready fast full-text search feature.
(*) PGroonga: https://
I often work with the output of pg_restore from a custom format dump
file. For example a file produced by running
pg_restore -s -1 -L listfile dumpfile
where listfile has been edited to comment out most of the rows to leave
only the data base objects I'm currently interested in.
Most often,
On 01/17/2015 10:05 AM, Berend Tober wrote:
I often work with the output of pg_restore from a custom format dump
file. For example a file produced by running
pg_restore -s -1 -L listfile dumpfile
where listfile has been edited to comment out most of the rows to leave
only the data base objects
Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 01/17/2015 10:05 AM, Berend Tober wrote:
I often work with the output of pg_restore from a custom format dump
file...
Most often, I'm refactoring functions and so don't really want to drop
the function but rather want to do a "create or replace function"...
I am not see
On 01/17/2015 10:05 AM, Berend Tober wrote:
I often work with the output of pg_restore from a custom format dump
file. For example a file produced by running
pg_restore -s -1 -L listfile dumpfile
where listfile has been edited to comment out most of the rows to leave
only the data base objects
Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 01/17/2015 10:05 AM, Berend Tober wrote:
I often work with the output of pg_restore from a custom format dump
file. ...
Most often, I'm refactoring functions and so don't really want to drop
the function but rather want to do a "create or replace function"...
Not sure
Berend Tober wrote on 17.01.2015 19:05:
I often work with the output of pg_restore from a custom format dump
file. For example a file produced by running
pg_restore -s -1 -L listfile dumpfile
where listfile has been edited to comment out most of the rows to
leave only the data base objects I'm
Thomas Kellerer wrote:
Berend Tober wrote on 17.01.2015 19:05:
I often work with the output of pg_restore from a custom format dump
file. ...
Most often, I'm refactoring functions and so don't really want to
drop the function but rather want to do a "create or replace
function" ...
To me thi
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Kouhei Sutou wrote:
> (Is this mailing list right mailing list for asking this
> question...?)
Hackers would have been fine as well.
> Is there any plan to implement PostgreSQL API to implement
> WAL supported extension?
Not that I know of, the last discussion I
13 matches
Mail list logo