I recently upgraded from 9.2.1 to 9.2.2 and my unit tests for my application
are failing when cleaning up my test database.
I am using the statement:
drop owned by wbjunit cascade;
at the end of a test suite to get rid of everything that was created during the
tests.
Now since the upgrade
Hi there
I have a VM running under XEN XCP. The VM is Ubuntu server 12.04.1/64
headless.
The VM is completely fresh & clean and works fine. Then I install
Postgresql...
sudo apt-get install python-software-properties
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:pitti/postgresql
sudo apt-get update
s
Thomas Kellerer wrote on 09.12.2012 11:36:
I recently upgraded from 9.2.1 to 9.2.2 and my unit tests for my application
are failing when cleaning up my test database.
I am using the statement:
drop owned by wbjunit cascade;
at the end of a test suite to get rid of everything that was crea
On 12/09/2012 02:40 AM, P. Broennimann wrote:
Hi there
I have a VM running under XEN XCP. The VM is Ubuntu server 12.04.1/64
headless.
The VM is completely fresh & clean and works fine. Then I install
Postgresql...
sudo apt-get install python-software-properties
sudo add-apt-repositor
Le vendredi 30 novembre 2012 à 09:44 -0500, François Beausoleil a
écrit :
> I'm using 9.1.5 on Ubuntu 11.10, in a streaming replication scenario. On my
> slave, recovery.conf states:
>
> standby_mode = on
> restore_command = '/usr/local/omnipitr/bin/omnipitr-restore -D
> /var/lib/postgresql/9.1
It seems that we are currently running 8.4.3 on the server we are
encountering the problem.
Will upgrade to 8.4.9 and then will come back with a test case if we still
see the issue
Thanks again for your help.
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Statistics-
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 6:44 AM, François Beausoleil
wrote:
>
> How come no new restart points were achieved? I had 4008 WAL archives on my
> slave. I expected them to be removed as streaming replication progressed. Are
> restart points prevented while long queries are running?
They can be pre
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Condor wrote:
> I am interested to know where is my mistake or something wrong
> with server which I doubt. Here is my current query with explain:
> (I change names to XXX YYY ZZZ because original names is written on CP1251
> and most ppl in list can't read them)
>
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> I recently upgraded from 9.2.1 to 9.2.2 and my unit tests for my application
> are failing when cleaning up my test database.
>
> I am using the statement:
>
>drop owned by wbjunit cascade;
>
> at the end of a test suite to get rid of ev
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Henry Drexler wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>>
>> Could you do it for the recursive
>> SQL (the one inside the function) like you had previously done for the
>> regular explain?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Jeff
>
>
> Here they are:
>
> for the
On Dec 9, 2012, at 22:20, Zbigniew wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As I read while googling the web, many people complained about this
> before. Couldn't it be made optional (can be even with "default ON")?
> I understand, that there are situations, when it is a must - for
> example, when the rest of querie
On 2012-12-10 00:31, Jeff Janes wrote:
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Condor wrote:
I am interested to know where is my mistake or something wrong
with server which I doubt. Here is my current query with explain:
(I change names to XXX YYY ZZZ because original names is written on
CP1251
and
Jeff Janes, 09.12.2012 23:41:
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
I recently upgraded from 9.2.1 to 9.2.2 and my unit tests for my application
are failing when cleaning up my test database.
I am using the statement:
drop owned by wbjunit cascade;
at the end of a test s
On 11/14/12 2:11 AM, Toby Corkindale wrote:
So on the face of it, I think the Sandforce-based drives are probably a
winner here, so I should look at the Intel 520s for evaluation, and
whatever the enterprise equivalent are for production.
As far as I know the 520 series drives fail the requirem
Jeff Janes, 09.12.2012 23:41:
I recently upgraded from 9.2.1 to 9.2.2 and my unit tests for my application
are failing when cleaning up my test database.
I am using the statement:
drop owned by wbjunit cascade;
at the end of a test suite to get rid of everything that was created during
th
15 matches
Mail list logo