Thanks Sim , I solved the problem .
It's due to my pg_xlog is not mounted in the server.
Cheers!
Sim Zacks wrote:
On 08/04/2011 08:46 AM, Adarsh Sharma wrote:
Dear all,
Today I do some changes in postgresql.conf &shmmax parameters as :
root~# cat /proc/sys/kernel/shmall
8388608
root~# cat /
Hi there,
I created a directory /usr/local/pgsql/data to store the data of
postgresql and ran
$ initdb -D /usr/local/pgsql/data
After that, I tried to start the postgresql service on my fedora 15 box via
$ sudo service postgresql start
but it has failed with the message
Starting postgresql (v
Gergely Buday writes:
> Hi there,
>
> I created a directory /usr/local/pgsql/data to store the data of
> postgresql and ran
>
> $ initdb -D /usr/local/pgsql/data
>
> After that, I tried to start the postgresql service on my fedora 15 box via
>
> $ sudo service postgresql start
>
> but it has fail
> Set and export the PGDATA variable in the rc script to the data
> dirrectory path and try again.
Thanks it worked.
- Gergely
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
I'm in the unenviable position of needing to check various input to
ensure that it doesn't contain any PostgreSQL/SQL key words/reserved
words.
The initial implementation simply made a copy of this table:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/sql-keywords-appendix.html#KEYWORDS-TABLE
into a s
Good morning!
When I installed version 8.3.12, I used a local account as the service account.
Well, we're getting into an issue where because it's a local account it gets
removed from the "logon as a service" list because its not a domain account
(part of our global policy object).
So my q
On 4 August 2011 13:53, Bill Moran wrote:
> Is there a pg_* or other table in the database that I can query for this
> list? Or some other automated method that can be employed?
All keywords are listed in src/backend/parser/gram.y:
/* ordinary key words in alphabetical order */
%token ABORT_P
Good morning!
When I installed version 8.3.12, I used a local account as the service account.
Well, we're getting into an issue where because it's a local account it gets
removed from the "logon as a service" list because its not a domain account
(part of our global policy object).
So my q
Bill Moran writes:
> Is there a pg_* or other table in the database that I can query for this
> list? Or some other automated method that can be employed?
In recent versions, "select * from pg_get_keywords()"
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pg
On 4/08/2011 9:28 PM, Steven Boyd wrote:
Good morning!
When I installed version 8.3.12, I used a local account as the service account. Well,
we're getting into an issue where because it's a local account it gets removed from the
"logon as a service" list because its not a domain account (part
In response to Tom Lane :
> Bill Moran writes:
> > Is there a pg_* or other table in the database that I can query for this
> > list? Or some other automated method that can be employed?
>
> In recent versions, "select * from pg_get_keywords()"
That's fantastic ... exactly what I needed to mak
In article <1312401318.5199.yahoomailclas...@web120108.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>,
Ioana Danes writes:
> Hi,
> I am planning to use the contrib module hstore
> but I would like to install it on a separate schema, not public,
> and include the schema in the search_path.
> Do you know if there are any
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Moran [mailto:wmo...@potentialtech.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 8:53 AM
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: query to get the list of key (reserverd) words?
>
>
> I'm in the unenviable position of needing to check various input to
> e
Currently I have a de-normalized table with two sets of "records" embedded
(i.e., [id, item1_name, item1_amount, item2_name, item2_amount]). My goal
is to output two records (i.e., [id, item_name, item_amount]) into an
intermediate result and then remove any records where item_name IS NULL or
"bl
From: Michael Black [mailto:michaelblack75...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 6:42 PM
To: pol...@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: [GENERAL] Is there a better way to unnest an entire row?
I do not see where you would need to do a self-join on the table. However,
a union would work nice t
15 matches
Mail list logo